Drinking, Drug Use, and Addiction in the Autism Community

Overview

This comprehensive clinical resource examines the intersection of ASD and SUD, challenging the long-held assumption that Autism provides inherent protection against addiction. Drawing on recent research, clinical experience, and lived accounts from individuals with dual diagnoses, the book presents evidence that as Autistic individuals become increasingly mainstreamed into typical peer groups and social environments, their exposure to substances and social pressure has fundamentally shifted their risk profile. The book is designed for clinicians, families, educators, self-advocates with Autism, and addiction professionals seeking to understand why substance use rates are elevated in Autistic populations and how to screen, assess, and treat dual diagnoses effectively.

Core Concepts & Guidance

Why Autistic Individuals Turn to Substances

Autistic individuals use alcohol, cannabis, opioids, benzodiazepines, and other substances primarily as rational coping mechanisms for genuine Neurological challenges rather than as moral failures or weakness. The primary drivers include:

Social Anxiety and Social Deficits: Approximately 85% of Autistic individuals experience high levels of anxiety. Alcohol acts as “social lubrication,” reducing social anxiety and creating a sense of relaxation, competence, and belonging. As one individual explained: “Alcohol made me able to talk to people, know what to say, and understand social timing—things I couldn’t do sober.” For many Autistic individuals desperately seeking peer connection and acceptance, substances provide crucial access to social situations—bars, parties, dating—where they would otherwise feel paralyzed. One person stated: “I crave alcohol because I think if I could just drink I could go to bars and meet people my own age.”

Racing Thoughts and Ruminations: Autistic individuals frequently experience persistent, intrusive thoughts and rumination that contribute to low self-esteem and depression. Alcohol and drugs “decelerate racing thoughts” and block these negative rumination cycles, providing temporary mental quieting. One individual described alcohol as “greasing the squeaky and rusty cogs”—things ran smoothly, got quiet, and the world seemed more approachable and real rather than fragile and Sensory-imploding.

Sensory Overwhelm: High sensory sensitivity is a hallmark of Autism, making everyday environments feel chaotic, painful, or unbearable. Substances appear to modulate sensory processing, making the world more tolerable and less assaultive. This is not escapism but functional adaptation to genuine Neurological Sensory distortion.

Unemployment and Boredom: Autistic individuals face exceptionally high unemployment rates despite education and capability. The resulting boredom, frustration, and lack of purpose create vulnerability to substance use or compulsive gaming, which provide structure, achievement, and identity. Gaming particularly satisfies unmet social needs in a format Autistic brains may prefer—online environments offer respect, status, and community without the overwhelming social barriers of face-to-face interaction, yet operate “biologically like any other addicting drug,” releasing dopamine equivalently to substance addiction.

Trauma and Emotional Pain: Many Autistic individuals carry histories of bullying, abuse, social rejection, and pervasive feelings of not belonging. Substances numb these painful emotions and provide temporary relief from cumulative trauma.

The Social Capital of Substance Use: Contrary to assumptions that Autistic individuals lack social motivation, research and lived accounts reveal many Autistic individuals desperately desire social connection and acceptance. For these individuals, drugs and alcohol provide significant social currency: entry into peer groups and social circles, acceptance by others who feel marginalized, status within drug-dealing subcultures (which often have clear rules and rituals Autistic individuals find comprehensible), and membership in online communities. Substances also enable “passing” as Neurotypical and managing the exhaustion of masking Autistic traits in mainstream settings.

The Erosion of Protective Factors

Historically, Autism was considered protective against substance abuse due to characteristics that are now being systematically reduced through early intervention. These protective factors included:

Strict rule-following and discomfort with rule-breaking: Many Autistic children strictly adhere to rules and feel genuine distress at violation
Sensory sensitivities: Difficulty ingesting or inhaling substances due to taste, texture, or smell aversions
Avoidance of social venues: Reduced exposure to bars, parties, and other settings where substances are used
Limited social networks: Fewer peer connections and less access to illegal substances
Financial constraints: Lower employment rates reducing means to purchase drugs or alcohol

However, these protective factors are eroding as children with Autism receive earlier, more intensive interventions (ABA, speech Therapy, social skills training) explicitly designed to reduce these very traits. Improved social skills, increased Sensory tolerance, greater flexibility with routines, and better mainstream outcomes mean Autistic individuals are now increasingly mainstreamed into typical peer groups, schools, colleges, and workplaces—directly exposing them to substances and peer pressure previously avoided.

This represents a crucial paradox: the same interventions that improve global development and educational outcomes simultaneously remove the barriers that historically protected Autistic individuals from substance use. Clinicians and parents alike fail to recognize that successful mainstreaming carries hidden costs.

The Distinction Between Coping, Self-Medication, and Addiction

Understanding these distinctions is critical for treatment planning and reducing Stigma:

Coping is a healthy response to stress that maintains overall wellbeing. Exercise for stress relief, meditation for anxiety, or taking aspirin for a headache are healthy forms of self-medication.

Self-medication specifically means choosing substances without professional guidance to manage symptoms. For Autistic individuals, this may involve:

Using alcohol to reduce social anxiety before events
Cannabis to suppress Sensory hypersensitivity or anxiety
Benzodiazepines to manage acute anxiety
Opioids to address both pain and social overwhelm

Importantly, self-medication exists on a spectrum and may sometimes be genuinely therapeutic. One individual reported: “Cannabis is an excellent medicine for combating the symptoms of Asperger’s. It’s the only medicine that works for me; as small a dose as I want, no headaches or sickness, no awful side effects.” Similarly, Tim Page, author with undiagnosed Asperger’s, described alcohol as “a central solvent that my body chemistry had been missing” after his Diagnosis—suggesting for him, alcohol addressed genuine Neurological needs rather than being merely escapist. This nuance is crucial: some Autistic individuals may experience substances as legitimately addressing their neurology, which complicates traditional abstinence-based treatment.

Addiction/Dependency develops through complex factors including familial background, brain chemistry, trauma history, Support systems, and Neurological predisposition. Addiction involves:

Development of tolerance (requiring increasingly larger amounts)
Physical and psychological dependence
Loss of control over use despite negative consequences
Continued use despite awareness of harm

It’s critical to note that approximately 8.5% of Americans aged 12+ meet criteria for substance use disorder, while 25% report binge drinking—showing that problematic use exists on a spectrum before full addiction develops. Early identification of problematic patterns, before dependency solidifies, is crucial.

Shared Neurobiological Mechanisms Between Autism and Addiction

Recent research reveals striking neurobiological parallels:

Perseveration as a Bridge: Both Autism and addiction involve perseveration—difficulty stopping a thought or behavior once initiated. Autistic individuals experience this as restricted interests and routinized behaviors. In addiction, “cravings” or “desire thinking” represent similar perseveration, with unconscious stimuli (locations, Sensory cues like white powder) triggering powerful urges years after abstinence. Twin studies demonstrate Autistic traits (communication challenges, social difficulties, Repetitive behaviors) are associated with increased marijuana and alcohol abuse, suggesting neurobiological similarities. Crucially, the same Neurological circuits that control OCD also control addiction—whether the problem is failing to stop an impulsive action or ending a habitual routine, many of the same brain regions engage.

Routine, Structure, and Cloninger’s Type 1 Alcoholism: Cloninger’s model identifies Type 1 alcoholism as associated with anxiety, emotional dependence, cautiousness, rigidity, and orderliness—characteristics aligned with Autism. Type 1 addiction is highly structured and repetitive, “loaded with rules.” Many individuals with substance dependencies follow exact rituals: dealers’ schedules, specific preparation methods, particular locations for use. The ritual itself—cutting lines with a razor on a mirror, injecting with others, the predictable sequence—offers rewards independent of the substance’s pharmacological effects. Individuals may resist stopping addiction not because of physical withdrawal but because of losing the predictability and known routine—a description “sounding uncannily familiar to anyone with Autism.”

Endorphins, Stimming, and Self-Harm: Repetitive self-soothing behaviors (stimming) in Autism serve to mitigate anxiety and stress. Research suggests self-harm behaviors may operate through endorphin-related mechanisms: either the brain produces opioids creating natural anesthesia so pain isn’t felt, or the behaviors stimulate endorphin production and the brain becomes “addicted” to maintaining that production. Notably, naltrexone (used to treat opioid and alcohol dependence) has been studied for treating self-injurious and Repetitive behaviors in Autism, though results have been mixed. This connection reveals how the same neurobiological reward systems may facilitate both Autism-related Repetitive behaviors and substance addiction.

Genetic Predisposition: Twin studies demonstrate ASD has 74–98% heritability, while SUD has lower but still significant genetic components. Crucially, SUD requires environmental exposure (access to the substance) to manifest, while Autism’s environmental triggers remain unclear. The AUTS2 gene (Autism susceptibility candidate 2) is associated with both alcohol and heroin consumption, suggesting genetic overlap. However, discovering a gene’s role doesn’t lead to cures—nearly 25 years after identifying the HTT gene causing Huntington’s disease, no cure exists, partly because genes create “tangled and thorny connections” with other genes.

Oxytocin: A Bridge Between Conditions: Recent research targets oxytocin, a natural hormone regulating social bonding, maternal behaviors, and sexual pleasure. Mice bred with Autism-associated mutations have less oxytocin in their brains. Oxytocin is being tested for both Autism and addiction because: (1) Autistic individuals may have variants in the oxytocin receptor gene affecting social bonding, (2) individuals with SUD may have similar oxytocin deficits making them vulnerable to seek pleasure through drugs when social bonding offers minimal reward, and (3) substances like MDMA stimulate the brain’s oxytocin systems. Studies show oxytocin has “acute inhibitory effects on the intake of alcohol, opiates and stimulants,” suggesting potential therapeutic applications for both conditions. Future treatments could theoretically address both social bonding deficits and addiction vulnerability simultaneously, treating root causes rather than symptoms.

Late Diagnosis and the Self-Medication Narrative

A consistent theme in clinical literature and lived accounts is that many individuals with dual diagnoses (ASD + SUD) received Autism diagnoses in adulthood, often only after substance use became problematic. These individuals frequently report using substances to self-medicate for long-standing, undiagnosed Autism symptoms—the cumulative struggle of feeling different, unable to meet expectations, socially awkward, and profoundly alienated. One undiagnosed individual described alcohol as making him “normal,” expressing confusion why others weren’t equally drunk if they experienced comparable anxiety levels.

Critical distinction: Early Diagnosis carries both protective and risk factors. Early intervention (ABA, speech Therapy, social skills training) improves global development and reduces comorbid anxiety and depression—clearly protective against SUD. However, early Diagnosis also carries hidden risks: intensive Therapy creates family financial and emotional strain; poor long-term adult outcomes despite early intervention suggest intensive childhood treatment doesn’t necessarily translate to adult flourishing; children extensively accommodated may not develop strong self-advocacy skills crucial for managing adult challenges.

Additionally, racial bias in Diagnosis means white children are 2.6 times more likely to receive Autism diagnoses than African-American children, while African-American children are 5 times more likely to receive ADHD diagnoses—creating unequal access to protective early intervention and creating different SUD vulnerability profiles across racial groups.

The Opioid Crisis and Autism-Specific Vulnerabilities

The opioid epidemic poses particular danger to Autistic individuals due to specific cognitive and behavioral traits:

Literal compliance: Autistic individuals may accept prescribed opioids more compliantly, following doctor’s instructions literally even when side effects make them feel “out of it” or when pain is adequately managed but prescriptions continue
Rapid dependence: Opioids appear to resolve both pain and social/Sensory issues simultaneously, creating rapid dependence. One individual reported: “It was the first time I felt normal. I just felt human for the first time”
Sensory barriers bypassed: Marketing of sweet, alcoholic beverages (Alcopops like Mike’s Hard Lemonade, sweet wine coolers) deliberately bypasses Sensory barriers that might otherwise protect Autistic individuals from alcohol
Prescription acquisition: Many teenagers with Autism not immune to opioid exposure through sports injuries, surgery, or dental work. As one clinician stated: “I cannot tell you the number of patients currently addicted to heroin who say addiction began after Percocet or Vicodin prescribed for high school injury”

The Tension Between Self-Determination and Harm Prevention

The Autism field has fundamentally shifted toward self-determination and autonomy for adults with disabilities, moving away from historical institutionalization and infantilization. Conversely, the substance abuse field remains dominated by abstinence-focused treatment and Twelve-Step philosophy (“We admitted we were powerless”), emphasizing that self-determination regarding substance use is inherently harmful.

Harm reduction offers a middle path, incorporating “a spectrum of strategies from safer use, to managed use to abstinence” to meet individuals “where they’re at.” For Autistic individuals, this tension is acute: some report that moderate, controlled substance use helps them socialize or manage Sensory overload more effectively than available alternatives. One individual stated: “I have decided that I won’t be quitting drinking fully because I noticed a great part of my social life will be gone and to me that’s not worth it.” Conversely, parents worry about daily marijuana use in their teen with Autism, fearing obsessive dependence.

This creates an ethical tension balancing “dignity of risk” (respecting autonomy and self-determination) against security and preventing harm—without sacrificing either liberty or equality. Treatment must involve the individual in decision-making rather than imposing abstinence-only approaches.

Concrete Thinking and Unexpected Risk Factors

Autistic traits paradoxically become risk factors in certain contexts:

Literal interpretation of social rules: Autistic individuals breaking rules they deeply believe in to feel accepted creates profound shame and cognitive dissonance that feeds addiction cycles
Unexpected social stressors: Innocent behaviors (sitting alone at a playground, stimming in public, wearing headphones) can trigger police encounters and trauma that increase substance use vulnerability
Difficulty recognizing problematic patterns: Concrete thinking may prevent recognition that daily use represents addiction, or belief that drugs marketed as “natural” (cannabis, herbal supplements) cannot be harmful

Practical Strategies & Techniques

Screening and Assessment for Dual Diagnosis

Screening for SUD among individuals with ASD is NOT currently routine in psychiatric settings, despite growing evidence of elevated risk. This represents a critical oversight: CDC data shows only 1 in 6 U.S. Adults were ever asked by health professionals about drinking. Most Autism service organizations (nearly all but one studied) do NOT routinely screen for substance use, often claiming SUD is too rare to prioritize given other challenges.

Simple, Direct Screening Tools That Work:

Single-Question Assessment (most efficient):

“How many times in the past year have you used an illegal drug or prescription medication nonmedically?”

CAGE Approach (two or more “yes” answers suggests problem drinking):

Cut down on drinking?
Annoyed by complaints about drinking?
Guilty about drinking?
Eye-opener drink in morning?

SBIRT Framework (Screening → Brief Intervention → Referral to Treatment): Structured protocol for healthcare settings

Autism-Adapted Screening (Likert-scale alternatives more effective than yes/no): Instead of binary questions, offer specific options like:

“I feel buzzed 2 or fewer times/week” or “3-5 times/week” or “daily”
Allows clients with literal thinking to choose the best fit
More accurate self-reporting for individuals with communication differences

Red Flags for Substance Use in Autism:

Legal or criminal complications without obvious connection to drug use
Unexplained money problems or inability to account for expenses
New friends appearing after social events, especially unfamiliar names
Unexpected mood swings or energy shifts within a single day
Unseasonable clothing (long sleeves in summer) attributed to Sensory issues but potentially concealing injection marks
Missing household items (possible means to purchase drugs)
Easy internet access enabling acquisition of substances or pills from medicine cabinets

Screening Tools for Autism Within SUD Settings:

RAADS-14 Screen (Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale): Quick preliminary screening available online
Gold standard: Multidisciplinary team Assessment including ADOS (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule) and ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised)
Adaptive behavior scales: Vineland or ABAS often required by states for accessing ASD-targeted services

Identifying Autism in SUD Populations: For addiction specialists, identifying co-occurring Autism is challenging because intoxication masks Autism traits and withdrawal presents confusing psychiatric symptoms. Key indicators of possible ASD in SUD patients:

Poor or unusual Eye contact (limited, too intense, or appearing “through” rather than “at” someone)
Formal, literal, or blunt speech seeming rude
Stiff or awkward gait and unusual physical mannerisms
Heightened Sensory sensitivities (light, tastes, textures, sounds, smells)
Insistence on routines
Unusually intense, focused interests (e.g., knowing exact band tour dates from 2002, not just liking heavy metal)

Critical consideration: Protracted withdrawal can last over a year. If anxiety persists months after detoxification, this indicates symptom rebound—the original anxiety/depression that prompted self-medication is returning. Individuals with Autism who used substances for anxiety management face extreme anxiety upon withdrawal and require parallel anxiety management treatment to prevent relapse.

Evidence-based Treatment Approaches Adapted for Autism

CBT emerges as the most effective treatment for dual Diagnosis because it’s concrete, logical, and aligns with how Autistic minds typically work better than emotion-based psychoanalytic therapies. CBT teaches awareness of stressors triggering substance use, challenges faulty thinking patterns, and systematically changes behavior. One adult with ASD praised CBT: “This Therapy aims to make one examine thoughts and change them if faulty. By challenging these thoughts, addictive behaviour can be amended. This seems to be the best Therapy for those on the Autistic Spectrum.”

Critical Autism-Specific Modifications:

One-on-One Treatment (Not Group Therapy): Group Therapy increases social anxiety, creates vulnerability to peer influence, makes it difficult to keep up with rapid conversation, and introduces unpredictable social dynamics. Individual counseling allows consistent, predictable interaction adapted to the person’s communication style.

Structured, Predictable Appointments: Same day and time weekly, consistent format, clear agenda provided in advance. Autistic individuals function optimally with predictability and reduced cognitive load from navigating changing formats.

Controlled Substance Use Over Total Abstinence: Research and clinical experience suggest harm reduction—allowing reduced, controlled use—may increase treatment engagement and client autonomy while still preventing escalation. This challenges traditional AA all-or-nothing thinking but aligns with evidence-based practice and respects self-determination. Some individuals achieve and maintain significant reduction (e.g., from daily use to weekly use) through harm reduction approaches even if they never achieve complete abstinence—clinicians should recognize this as success rather than failure.

Patient Participation in Treatment Planning: Allow client input on appointment frequency, duration, and goals. This increases engagement and empowerment, crucial for individuals with Autism who often have experienced extensive control by professionals.

Concrete Goal-Setting: Short-term (1-2 weeks), meaningful, measurable, aligned with client priorities. Avoid abstract long-term goals; focus on specific, achievable milestones.

Data-Focused Tracking: Individuals with Autism often respond exceptionally well to computerized logs, charts, and quantifiable progress measurement. Daily tracking of substance use, mood, anxiety levels, and activities creates concrete awareness and enables pattern identification.

Structured Daily Alternatives to Substance Use: One clinician successfully used a “grab bag” approach with client “B”: a bag containing 10+ randomized daily activities (call friend, solitaire, fiction writing, video games, library visits) to provide structure and replace substance-seeking time. Paired with role-play for calling friends and crisis hotlines, daily calendar with positive affirmations and meal tracking, and social narratives addressing specific scenarios (e.g., “Feeling Resentful When Others Drink”), this structured approach enabled sustained sobriety without traditional meetings.

Modified AA Language: Traditional Twelve-Step language (“powerlessness,” “spiritual awakening,” “making amends”) doesn’t resonate with many Autistic individuals. Treatment language should emphasize concrete control (identifying triggers, changing responses), scientific understanding of brain chemistry, and specific behavioral changes rather than spiritual or emotional abstracts.

Medication Considerations:

Avoid when possible: Benzodiazepines (Valium, Xanax, Klonopin, Ativan) are habit-forming and carry high abuse risk; if prescribed, monitor dosage carefully and consider time limits.

Target underlying conditions: SSRIs (Zoloft, Lexapro) for anxiety/depression; focus on treating the symptoms that prompted self-medication rather than addiction directly.

Craving-reduction medications: Naltrexone or Campral diminish rewards from alcohol/opioids, reducing urge to use.

Maintenance options: Methadone or buprenorphine (Suboxone/Subutex) for opioid dependence management.

Important cautions: Monitor medication interactions; certain psychotropic medications mixed with alcohol are lethal combinations. Recognize individuals with Autism may respond to medications differently; careful monitoring essential after new prescriptions. Some parents note that “legal” psychiatric medications (SSRIs causing unknown cellular changes in developing brains) may pose greater risks than alternatives like marijuana, creating a paradox where prescribing potentially addictive medications occurs alongside warnings against self-medication.

Treatment Delivery Options

Outpatient individual counseling: Allows person to remain in community with existing supports; most accessible option
Short-term residential (2 weeks–90 days): Intensive treatment before community transition; useful for acute crises
Long-term residential (6 months–2 years): Effective if substance use started very young; allows learning to function without substances; important caveat: deinstitutionalization laws may prevent government facilities from admitting individuals with co-occurring intellectual/developmental disability
Halfway/three-quarters houses (Oxford House model): Semi-residential community living with others in recovery; provides peer Support and structured environment

Peer Support and Community Options

AA and NA are ubiquitous but problematic for many Autistic individuals:

Challenges with AA/NA:

Emphasis on “powerlessness” conflicts with empowerment and self-determination
Highly social environments increase anxiety
Unclear unspoken rules and social expectations
Twelve-step language may not resonate with concrete thinking
Rapid group conversations difficult to follow
Unpredictable dynamics and forced sharing create stress

Benefits for Some:

Structured, built-in peer Support
Relatable community of others with lived experience
Free and widely available
One individual with ASD described AA as “a trellis plants grow on—providing structure I can wrap around while doing the work of growing”

Alternative Support Models:

SMART Recovery: Self-empowerment focused; emphasizes personal responsibility and motivation
Rational Recovery: Cognitive approach; emphasizes logical thinking and self-directed recovery
Women for Sobriety: Designed for women; emphasizes emotion and spirituality but in different language than AA
Celebrate Recovery: Faith-based but less dogmatic than AA
Peer Support from Autistic individuals: Particularly valuable—Autistic individuals with lived SUD experience provide uniquely credible guidance and understanding

Recommendation: Peer Support should complement (not replace) counseling/treatment. Forcing attendance at meetings that increase anxiety is counterproductive; the best peer Support matches the individual’s communication style and values.

Addressing Comorbid Mental Health and Life Domains

Many individuals with ASD+SUD have co-occurring anxiety, depression, OCD, ADHD, and elevated suicide risk. Comprehensive treatment requires cross-system collaboration addressing:

Employment needs: Job coaching, workplace Accommodations, vocational training
Stable housing: Critical foundation; homelessness vastly increases SUD severity
Relationship repair: Rebuilding trust with family members damaged by substance use
Daily living skills training: Budgeting, meal planning, hygiene, organization
Meaningful activities: Structured purpose reduces relapse vulnerability; may include work, volunteering, hobbies, or community involvement

Prevention for at-Risk Youth and Adolescents

Given rising Autism diagnoses (rates increased 10-17% annually from 1990s onward), prevention is critical:

Early Intervention (Middle School): Address emotion regulation skills, anxiety management, and coping strategies before high school exposure to substances. Traditional prevention has focused on elementary; middle school is crucial transition point.

Transition Planning: Include substance use risk discussion in IEP transition meetings (age 16+). Explicit conversation about why Autistic individuals are vulnerable to substance use, what to watch for, and how to seek help.

Social Narratives: Use Social Stories™ to address fitting in vs. Long-term drug/alcohol impact. Narrative format aligns with Autistic thinking and can be personalized to individual’s specific vulnerabilities.

Universal Interventions: Minimum drinking age, DUI laws, reduced substance availability—population-level strategies benefiting all youth

Selective Interventions: Target high-risk Autistic adolescents specifically; adapt prevention materials for Autistic communication preferences and Sensory needs

Indicated Interventions: Brief intervention for those already using but not yet dependent; early identification prevents escalation

Opioid Crisis Awareness: Adolescents with Autism not immune to prescription opioid exposure through sports injuries, surgery, or dental work. Education on addiction risks and monitoring for early warning signs critical.

Key Takeaways

Autism Is NOT a Protective Factor Against Addiction—It’s a Complex Risk Profile The assumption that Autism’s historical protective factors (rule-following, Sensory aversion, social avoidance, limited access) provide blanket protection is incorrect and dangerous if it prevents screening. Recent research shows individuals with Autism may have HIGHER rates of substance use disorder than the general population. Early interventions explicitly designed to reduce “Autistic” traits have removed these protective barriers while mainstreaming has exposed Autistic individuals directly to peer pressure and substances.
- Example: A child with Sensory issues around taste might previously have avoided alcohol due to unpleasant sensations, but early intervention could normalize Sensory experiences, opening them to sweet Alcopops marketed to youth.
Social Motivation Contradicts Clinical Assumptions, Leading to Underdiagnosis Despite research suggesting Autistic individuals have reduced social reward sensitivity, studies consistently show substance use is primarily motivated by social facilitation—fitting in, reducing awkwardness during social interaction, gaining acceptance, and belonging. Clinicians who assume Autistic individuals don’t desire social connection may fail to recognize substance misuse as a coping mechanism, leaving SUD undiagnosed and untreated.
- Example: An Autistic individual uses alcohol specifically to attend bars and meet peers, yet clinicians trained on outdated Autism profiles discount their social motivation, missing the addiction entirely.
Perseverative Behavior as a Bridge Between Autism and Addiction Creates Dual Vulnerability The same Neurological trait enabling Autistic individuals to focus intensely on Special interests without distraction can, if directed toward substances, create highly structured, ritual-based addictions. Both Autism and addiction involve difficulty regulating habitual behavior through similar brain circuits—meaning some individuals with Autism may be neurobiologically predisposed to addiction regardless of social factors. The intensity of focus and adherence to routine that serves Autistic people well in many contexts becomes liability when applied to substance use patterns.
- Example: A person with Autism meticulously learning every detail about Ford Mustangs mirrors a person with heroin addiction who knows exact dealer locations, injection rituals, and timing—both involve complete cognitive capture by a particular focus.
Self-Medication Exists on a Spectrum and May Be Genuinely Therapeutic for Some The line between problematic coping and legitimate self-treatment is blurred, particularly for Neurodivergent brains. Some substances may address actual Neurological symptoms rather than being purely escapist, requiring individualized Assessment rather than blanket prohibition. This nuance challenges abstinence-only treatment models and requires recognizing that some Autistic individuals’ substance use represents rational adaptation to genuine Neurological challenges.
- Example: One person reported cannabis was their only effective anxiety medication with no side effects; another used alcohol to resolve both physical pain and social overwhelm—for them, these weren’t addictions but symptom management, though dependency risks remain high.
Late Diagnosis Is Both Risk and Protective Factor Autistic individuals often diagnosed in adulthood have missed developmental Support, increasing SUD vulnerability through self-medication, social isolation, and employment instability. However, Diagnosis provides protective factors: self-understanding reduces shame, community connection with other Autistic individuals increases Support, legitimate Accommodations at work/school enable stability, and reduced self-blame enables treatment engagement. Clinical intervention should leverage Diagnostic clarity to build resilience.
- Example: A 35-year-old diagnosed with Autism after decades of alcohol use understands their “weird” social struggles were Autism-related, enabling targeted mental health treatment and community Support that reduces relapse risk.
Genetic Links and Oxytocin Research Suggest Unified Treatment Approaches Specific genes (like AUTS2) overlap between Autism and addiction; oxytocin deficiency appears in both conditions and may be addressable through targeted intervention. This suggests future treatments could address both social bonding deficits and addiction vulnerability simultaneously, rather than treating them as separate conditions. The neurobiological connection means treatment addressing root causes rather than symptoms alone may prove more effective.
- Example: Oxytocin Therapy could theoretically improve social function in Autism while simultaneously reducing substance-seeking behavior motivated by social deficits—treating the root Neurological cause rather than separate symptoms.
Screening Protocols Are Critically Absent in Autism Services, Creating Dangerous Blind Spots Nearly all Autism service organizations do NOT routinely screen for substance use, often assuming Autism’s inherent protective factors prevent addiction. This assumption contradicts research showing higher addiction rates in Autistic populations, creating a dangerous clinical blind spot where substance use disorders go undetected. Without screening, dual diagnoses remain invisible.
- Example: An Autistic individual with active alcohol dependence goes undiagnosed because clinicians assume their social anxiety and rigidity make them unlikely to abuse substances, while the very anxiety and need for structure may actually facilitate addiction.
Controlled Substance Use May Be More Realistic and Effective Than Abstinence-Only for Some Research and clinical experience suggest harm reduction—allowing reduced, controlled use—may increase treatment engagement and client autonomy while still preventing escalation. This challenges traditional AA all-or-nothing thinking but aligns with evidence-based practice and respects self-determination. For some Autistic individuals, complete abstinence reduces quality of life more than controlled use while creating treatment resistance.
- Example: Client “Mr. A” reduced drinking substantially through harm reduction (tracking weekly alcohol use via computerized log, setting manageable short-term goals) even though he never achieved complete abstinence—clinician recognized this as success and genuine progress rather than failure.
Treatment Must Be Individualized, Structured, and Data-Driven Rather Than Following Generic Protocols One-size-fits-all addiction treatment protocols are ineffective for Autistic individuals. Treatment must be predictable, concrete, provide clear structure, involve client participation in planning, track progress with data, and address co-occurring mental health and life domains (employment, housing, relationships). CBT adapted for concrete thinking outperforms emotion-based psychotherapies. Computer-tracked logs and quantified progress measurements align with Autistic cognitive preferences.
- Example: TEACCH approach with structured daily grab bag of activities, calendar with positive affirmations, social narratives for specific situations, and role-play practice enabled sustained sobriety without traditional meetings.
Harm Reduction Framework Respects Autistic Self-Determination While Managing Risk Rather than abstinence-only approaches, harm reduction acknowledges that reducing substance use—even without complete cessation—improves health outcomes. For Autistic individuals with SUD, this might mean controlled use rather than abstinence, medication-assisted treatment, managing triggers, and addressing co-occurring psychiatric conditions. The framework respects autonomy and dignity while preventing overdose, legal consequences, and health complications.
- Example: An Autistic adult states moderate alcohol use helps them socialize and manage Sensory overwhelm, while clinicians balance respecting their autonomy against preventing dependency—neither abstinence-only nor enabling use, but structured monitoring and reduction.
The Opioid Crisis Poses Particular Danger to Autistic Individuals Due to Literal Compliance and Rapid Dependence Autistic individuals may accept prescribed opioids compliantly, following literal instructions even when inappropriate. Opioids appear to resolve both pain and social/Sensory issues simultaneously, creating rapid dependence. Marketing of sweet alcoholic beverages bypasses Sensory barriers. Many current heroin users report addiction beginning with prescription opioids from high school injuries—adolescents with Autism are equally vulnerable.
- Example: An Autistic teen prescribed Vicodin for a sports injury follows instructions literally, doesn’t question when pain is resolved but prescriptions continue, develops rapid dependence, and later transitions to heroin when prescriptions end.
The Ethical Tension Between Self-Determination and Risk Reduction Requires Nuanced, Individualized Approaches The Autism field emphasizes self-determination and autonomy; addiction treatment emphasizes abstinence and “powerlessness.” Some Autistic individuals report controlled substance use functions more effectively than available treatments, creating ethical tension between respecting autonomy and preventing dependency. Treatment must balance “dignity of risk” against security, respecting individual agency while preventing catastrophic outcomes. This is particularly acute for individuals with Autism, who have historically been over-controlled and infantilized.
- Example: An Autistic adult prioritizes social participation (attending bars, connecting with peers) over complete abstinence, while parents fear addiction—treatment balances respecting the adult’s values and autonomy against legitimate dependency risks through structured monitoring and agreed-upon limits.

Memorable Quotes & Notable Statements

“Alcohol made me able to talk to people, know what to say, and understand social timing—things I couldn’t do sober.” — Individual with Autism explaining substance use for social facilitation. This quote directly contradicts the assumption that Autistic individuals lack social motivation; it reveals that substances provide genuine functional improvement for social participation, not mere escapism.
“Cannabis is an excellent medicine for combating the symptoms of Asperger’s. It’s the only medicine that works for me; as small a dose as I want, no headaches or sickness, no awful side effects.” — Individual with Autism describing self-medication. This challenges the abstinence-only framework and raises questions about when substances represent legitimate symptom management versus addiction.
“I crave alcohol because I think if I could just drink I could go to bars and meet people my own age.” — Individual with Autism articulating social motivation for substance use. Demonstrates how social isolation and desire for peer connection drive substance use in ways clinicians trained on outdated Autism profiles may miss entirely.
“Alcohol was like a central solvent that my body chemistry had been missing.” — Tim Page, author with undiagnosed Asperger’s, describing alcohol after his late-life Diagnosis. Suggests his substance use may have represented self-treatment for undiagnosed Neurological differences rather than mere escapism.
“I have decided that I won’t be quitting drinking fully because I noticed a great part of my social life will be gone and to me that’s not worth it.” — Individual with Autism explaining decision for controlled use over abstinence. Represents the ethical complexity of balancing self-determination against addiction risk—the person prioritizes social participation and autonomy over clinical abstinence goals.
“It just takes the edge off the nasty feeling you get when you’re trying to talk to somebody, that you feel stupid. You don’t get that if you’ve had alcohol.” — Study participant with Autism explaining substance use for social anxiety reduction. Directly addresses the functional role substances play in managing Autism-related challenges.
“It was the first time I felt normal. I just felt human for the first time.” — Individual with Autism describing opioid use. Captures how substances can provide transformative feeling of belonging and normalcy, making addiction particularly difficult to interrupt.
“This Therapy aims to make one examine thoughts and change them if faulty. By challenging these thoughts, addictive behaviour can be amended. This seems to be the best Therapy for those on the Autistic Spectrum.” — Individual with Autism praising cognitive behavioral Therapy. Endorsement from lived experience about which treatment approaches actually work for Autistic brains.
“A trellis plants grow on—providing structure I can wrap around while doing the work of growing.” — Individual with Autism describing AA. Demonstrates that for some Autistic individuals, structured peer Support provides genuinely helpful framework, while for others it increases anxiety.
“I cannot tell you the number of patients currently addicted to heroin who say addiction began after Percocet or Vicodin prescribed for high school injury.” — Clinician warning about opioid crisis vulnerability. Emphasizes that prescription opioid exposure represents critical intervention point where prevention could prevent decades of heroin addiction.

Counterintuitive Insights & Nuanced Perspectives

Misconception: Autism Provides Inherent Protection Against Addiction

What the common belief is: Historical research and clinical practice assume Autism’s protective factors (rule-following, Sensory sensitivities, social withdrawal, limited access to substances) provide automatic protection against substance use disorders. Some Autism specialists claim SUD is too rare in their populations to warrant screening.

What the research and lived experience reveal: Recent quantitative research (Butwicka et al. 2017 study of 26,900 individuals with ASD) documents increased risk of substance use-related problems in ASD population compared to general population. The protective factors are eroding as early interventions explicitly designed to reduce “Autistic” traits (Sensory sensitivities, rule-following, social avoidance) become standard. Mainstreaming into typical peer groups and schools exposes Autistic individuals directly to peer pressure and substances, while simultaneously removing barriers that historically protected them. The assumption that Autism is protective has created a dangerous clinical blind spot where substance use goes unscreened and undiagnosed.

What the common belief is: Research on “reduced attentional weight assigned to social rewards” in Autism has been misinterpreted to mean Autistic individuals don’t desire social connection. Clinical training often reinforces idea that Autistic individuals are socially withdrawn and lack peer motivation.

What the research and lived accounts reveal: Studies of both adolescents and adults who misuse drugs and alcohol consistently identify social fitting-in as a primary motivation—even for those with Autism. Individuals specifically use substances to reduce social anxiety, attend social venues (bars, parties), gain peer acceptance, and manage the exhaustion of masking in mainstream settings. The contradiction is stark: Autistic individuals supposedly have reduced social motivation, yet use substances specifically for social facilitation. This gap suggests clinicians trained on limited understanding of Autism may discount authentic social motivation when evaluating substance use risks, leading to underdiagnosis. Many Autistic individuals report desperate desire for peer connection and belonging—they’re not socially unmotivated, they’re socially overwhelmed.

Misconception: Self-Medication Is Always Problematic; Abstinence Is Always the Goal

What the common belief is: Addiction treatment uniformly emphasizes abstinence as the only acceptable outcome. Self-medication is framed as denial and rationalization. The Twelve-Step philosophy asserts people are “powerless” over substances and must achieve complete abstinence to recover.

What the nuanced perspective reveals: Self-medication exists on a spectrum. Some self-medication is healthy (aspirin for headaches, meditation for anxiety). For Autistic individuals, some substances may legitimately address Neurological symptoms (anxiety, Sensory overwhelm, social dysfunction) more effectively than available alternatives. One individual reported cannabis was their only effective anxiety medication with no side effects; another described alcohol as “central solvent” addressing undiagnosed neurology. Complete abstinence is not always achievable or desirable for everyone. Research shows harm reduction—structured, monitored reduction in use rather than abstinence—can be effective and may increase treatment engagement. For some individuals, “success” means reducing from daily use to weekly use, not achieving perfect abstinence. This requires balancing respect for autonomy and self-determination against genuine addiction risks—a tension that abstinence-only models cannot accommodate.

Misconception: Addiction in Autistic Individuals Is Primarily About Weakness, Poor Willpower, or Moral Failure

What the common belief is: Addiction is often framed in moral or volitional terms—failure of willpower, lack of self-control, poor character. This perspective is particularly prevalent in older literature and some clinical settings.

What the neurobiology reveals: Addiction involves brain chemistry, genetic predisposition, and Neurological mechanisms largely outside conscious control. Willpower itself is neurologically based—Temple Grandin noted willpower (the brain’s ability to endure sacrifices now for future benefits) is essential to resisting dependence, but some brains are simply “not wired” with this mechanism. Both Autism and addiction involve perseveration—difficulty stopping a behavior once initiated—controlled by similar brain circuits. Some Autistic individuals may be neurobiologically predisposed to addiction regardless of character or effort. The same single-mindedness that protects some Autistic individuals from addiction (obsessive focus on interests rather than substances) can paradoxically enable addiction if the obsessive focus turns toward drugs or alcohol. Understanding addiction as a neurobiological condition rather than moral failure enables compassionate, effective treatment rather than punishment and shame.

What the common belief is: Medications like Xanax, Valium, Klonopin, and Ativan are commonly prescribed to Autistic individuals for anxiety, often long-term, without explicit warning about dependence risks. These medications are considered “safer” than illicit drugs and are medically sanctioned.

What the critical context reveals: Benzodiazepines are habit-forming with rapid dependence development. Recent studies question SSRI efficacy in children, showing cellular brain changes without proven long-term safety. The paradox is striking: prescribing potentially addictive, dependency-prone medications while warning against self-medication with other substances like marijuana. One father questioned why marijuana shouldn’t be considered if SSRIs cause unknown cellular changes in developing brains. For Autistic individuals with history of substance issues or family addiction history, benzodiazepines carry heightened risk. Long-term benzodiazepine use represents a form of iatrogenic (doctor-induced) substance dependence that may be more dangerous than self-medication alternatives. Clinical prescribing of habit-forming medications while warning against addiction creates a troubling contradiction.

Misconception: Gaming and Internet Addiction Are Distinct from “real” Substance Addiction

What the common belief is: Gaming and internet overuse are often treated as separate from substance addiction, sometimes minimized as mere behavioral problems or time-wasting.

What the neurobiology reveals: Gaming operates “biologically like any other addicting drug,” releasing dopamine in ways neurologically equivalent to substance addiction. For individuals with ASD, gaming satisfies unmet social needs in a format Autistic brains may prefer—online environments offer respect, status, and community without social barriers of face-to-face interaction. Gaming addiction is currently the most commonly reported addiction in ASD populations. Treating it as distinct from substance addiction underestimates its severity and misses critical intervention opportunities. Additionally, the common recommendation to “redirect gaming obsessions into productive skill development” requires caution—addiction specialists know that substituting one compulsive behavior for another (work addiction replacing gambling) doesn’t necessarily resolve underlying addictive mechanism. Gaming addiction in Autism requires direct treatment, not just redirection.

Misconception: Early Intervention Always Protects Against Later Substance Use Problems

What the common belief is: Early intervention (ABA, speech Therapy, social skills training) is universally beneficial and protective. More intensive, earlier intervention is always better.

What the nuanced reality reveals: Early intervention has both protective AND risk factors. While early diagnosed children benefit from parental monitoring, school Accommodations, and reduced comorbid anxiety/depression—clearly protective against SUD—early Diagnosis also carries hidden risks. Intensive Therapy creates family financial and emotional strain; poor long-term adult outcomes despite early intensive intervention suggest childhood Therapy doesn’t necessarily translate to adult flourishing. More problematically, children extensively accommodated may not develop strong self-advocacy skills crucial for managing adult challenges independently. When mainstreaming removes the protective barriers (Sensory sensitivities, social avoidance, rule-following) that historically prevented substance use, children with early intervention may be particularly vulnerable if they haven’t developed robust coping skills or identity as Autistic individuals. Additionally, racial bias in Diagnosis means white children are 2.6 times more likely to be diagnosed than African-American children, creating unequal access to even these mixed-benefit interventions and creating different vulnerability profiles across racial groups.

What the common belief is: Autistic individuals’ tendency toward rule-following and literal interpretation suggests they would avoid breaking rules even under social pressure.

What the lived reality reveals: Autistic individuals desperately seeking peer acceptance will break rules they deeply believe in to feel accepted. The cognitive dissonance of violating their own values for social inclusion creates profound shame that feeds addiction cycles. They may not recognize their rule-breaking or understand its significance. Additionally, their literal interpretation of doctor’s instructions means Autistic individuals may take prescribed opioids more compliantly than Neurotypical peers, follow prescriptions literally even when inappropriate, and not question dosages or continued use when pain resolves. Innocent behaviors (sitting alone, stimming in public) can trigger police encounters and trauma that increase substance use vulnerability. The assumption that rule-following provides protection completely misses how Autistic individuals’ desperate need for social belonging can override their rule-orientation.

Misconception: Prescription Medications from Doctors Cannot Be As Addictive or Dangerous As Illicit Drugs

What the common belief is: Medications prescribed by doctors are inherently safer than self-medication or illicit drugs. Legal prescriptions shouldn’t create dependency risks.

What the opioid crisis reveals: Prescription opioids have created the largest addiction crisis in modern history. Many current heroin users report addiction beginning with prescription opioids from high school injuries. Autistic individuals’ literal compliance means they take prescriptions exactly as directed without question. Opioids appear to resolve both pain and social/Sensory overwhelm simultaneously, creating rapid dependence. Sweet, flavored opioid medications and Alcopops deliberately bypass Sensory barriers protecting Autistic individuals. The distinction between “legal medical substance” and “illicit drug” is not meaningful in terms of addiction risk. Some parents note that SSRIs (prescribed to many Autistic children) cause unknown cellular brain changes without proven long-term safety—potentially more dangerous than marijuana alternatives. Prescription medications require equal or greater vigilance than illicit substances for Autistic individuals prone to dependency.

Misconception: Autism Diagnosis in Childhood Is Always More Beneficial Than Late Adult Diagnosis

What the common belief is: Earlier Diagnosis is always better; late-diagnosed individuals miss critical early intervention opportunities and are therefore worse off.

What the research and lived experience suggest: Late Diagnosis carries both risks and unique protective factors. Late-diagnosed individuals often report using substances to self-medicate for long-standing, undiagnosed Autism symptoms—feeling different, unable to meet expectations, socially awkward, alienated. They missed early intervention and parental monitoring protective factors. However, late Diagnosis in adulthood (particularly after substance use problems emerge) can be transformative. One individual undiagnosed until adulthood reported: “I had no idea I was Autistic. Alcohol made me feel normal. When I finally got diagnosed, I realized my ‘stupidity’ and ‘weirdness’ weren’t personal failures—they were neurology.” The Diagnosis reframes their story from shame to self-understanding, enabling treatment engagement and recovery. Diagnosis can reduce internalized shame (“I’m broken”) and shift understanding to Neurological difference (“My brain is wired differently”). For some individuals, understanding their Autism AFTER substance issues began is actually more protective for recovery than early Diagnosis might have been, as it explains their struggles without shame and enables targeted Support. The comparison between early and late Diagnosis outcomes is understudied; clinical assumption that earlier is always better deserves questioning.

Critical Warnings & Important Notes

When to Seek Professional Help

This book addresses screening and initial Assessment, but substance use disorder requires professional treatment. Seek immediate professional intervention if:

Daily or near-daily substance use despite negative consequences
Failed attempts to cut down or stop using
Legal problems, employment loss, or relationship damage related to substance use
Neglect of important responsibilities
Continued use despite awareness of serious health or psychological problems
Withdrawal symptoms when attempting to stop (anxiety, sweating, tremors, insomnia)
Tolerance development (needing increasingly larger amounts to feel effects)

For Autism and addiction Comorbidity specifically, seek professionals who understand BOTH conditions or are willing to collaborate with specialists in each field. Most treatment settings don’t routinely assess for Autism; don’t hesitate to raise Autism history if clinicians seem confused about communication differences or treatment response.

Suicide Risk in Dual Diagnosis

Individuals with Autism AND substance use disorder have elevated suicide risk. Depression and anxiety commonly co-occur. Withdrawal from substances causes mood destabilization. If experiencing suicidal thoughts:

National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 988 (call or text)
Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741
International Association for Suicide Prevention: https://www.iasp.info/resources/Crisis_Centres/

Seek immediate emergency help if in acute crisis. Tell someone you trust about your thoughts.

The Protracted Withdrawal Timeline

Withdrawal from substances is not just acute discomfort lasting days. Protracted withdrawal—persistent withdrawal symptoms—can last over a year:

If anxiety persists months after detoxification, this indicates symptom rebound: the original anxiety/depression that prompted self-medication is returning
Individuals with Autism who used substances for anxiety management face extreme anxiety upon withdrawal and require parallel anxiety management treatment to prevent relapse
Do not assume clinical depression or anxiety emerging during withdrawal is treatment failure; it’s often unmasking the original mental health condition that prompted substance use
This timeline is critical for managing expectations and preventing relapse when individuals expect to feel “better” quickly

Medication Interactions Are Potentially Lethal

Certain combinations of psychotropic medications mixed with alcohol or drugs are dangerous or lethal:

Benzodiazepines + alcohol = respiratory depression, overdose, death
Opioids + alcohol = respiratory depression, overdose, death
SSRIs + MDMA = serotonin syndrome (potentially fatal)
Stimulants + cocaine = cardiac stress, heart attack

Always inform healthcare providers about ALL substances you consume (including alcohol, cannabis, prescribed medications) to prevent dangerous interactions. Don’t assume “it’s fine”—ask explicitly about interactions.

Screening Gaps Mean Your Substance Use May Go Undetected

Most Autism service organizations do NOT routinely screen for substance use. CDC data shows only 1 in 6 U.S. Adults are ever asked by health professionals about drinking. This means you must self-advocate:

Ask directly: Tell your Autism provider about substance use you’re concerned about. They may not ask.
Provide context: Explain that Autistic individuals often self-medicate for anxiety, social challenges, or Sensory issues. Your use may be rational adaptation to real Neurological challenges, not moral failure.
Request Assessment: Ask for formal screening using tools like CAGE or single-question Assessment
Don’t assume it will be identified: Clinicians trained on outdated “Autism is protective” assumptions may miss substance use entirely

Racial Bias in Diagnosis Creates Unequal Access to Protective Factors

White children are 2.6 times more likely to receive Autism diagnoses than African-American children, while African-American children are 5 times more likely to receive ADHD diagnoses. This creates:

Unequal access to early intervention protective factors
Different vulnerability profiles across racial groups
Potential over-reliance on ADHD medications (stimulants like Ritalin, Adderall) in communities missing Autism diagnoses
Healthcare disparities affecting SUD prevention and treatment

If you are from a racial/ethnic minority community, be aware that Autism may be underdiagnosed. Seek evaluation if you suspect Autism regardless of prior Diagnostic dismissal.

This Book Does Not Cover

Specific treatment for co-occurring intellectual disabilities
Substance use in non-speaking Autistic individuals (severely limited research)
Non-English language adaptation of screening tools
Substance use in Autistic girls/women (severely understudied; may differ from males)
Cultural variations in how substance use is conceptualized and treated
Substances beyond alcohol, cannabis, opioids, benzodiazepines, stimulants (MDMA, LSD, etc. Discussed minimally)
Long-term neurocognitive outcomes of substance use in Autistic brains
Criminal justice system navigation for Autistic individuals with substance-related charges
Harm reduction policies and advocacy

This book represents current research and clinical practice as of publication; neuroscience and treatment approaches are evolving. Consult current research and professionals for the most up-to-date information.

References & Resources Mentioned

Diagnostic and Assessment Tools

RAADS-14 (Ritvo Autism Asperger Diagnostic Scale) - Quick preliminary Autism screening available online
ADOS (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule) - Gold standard for Autism Diagnosis
ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised) - Gold standard for Autism Diagnosis
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales - Assesses adaptive functioning
ABAS (Adaptive Behavior Assessment System) - Assesses adaptive behavior; often required for accessing ASD services
CAGE questionnaire - Screens for problem drinking (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener)
SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral to Treatment) - Structured protocol for healthcare screening and intervention

Treatment Approaches and Models

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) - Evidence-based psychotherapy proven effective for dual Diagnosis; concrete and logical for Autistic minds
Family Behavior Therapy - Involves family members in treatment planning and Support
TEACCH (Treatment and Education of Autistic and related Communication-handicapped Children) - Structured, predictable approach using visual organization and daily grab bags of activities
Intensive Interaction - For non-verbal individuals; focuses on social engagement through natural interaction
Mindfulness-based interventions - May help with anxiety and cravings; adapted for Autism needs
Social Stories™ - Narrative format for teaching social skills and addressing specific scenarios

Peer Support and Recovery Programs

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) - Ubiquitous but problematic for many Autistic individuals; may work for some
Narcotics Anonymous (NA) - Similar to AA; Twelve-Step based
SMART Recovery (Self-Empowerment Focused) - Emphasizes personal responsibility and motivation
Rational Recovery - Cognitive approach; emphasizes logical thinking
Women for Sobriety - Designed for women; different language and approach than AA
Celebrate Recovery - Faith-based; less dogmatic than AA
Oxford House model - Semi-residential community living with others in recovery

Medications Mentioned

SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors): Zoloft, Lexapro - Treat depression and anxiety
Benzodiazepines: Valium (diazepam), Xanax (alprazolam), Klonopin (clonazepam), Ativan (lorazepam) - Treat acute anxiety but habit-forming
Naltrexone - Reduces cravings for alcohol and opioids
Campral (acamprosate) - Reduces cravings for alcohol
Methadone - Maintenance treatment for opioid dependence
Buprenorphine (Suboxone/Subutex) - Maintenance treatment for opioid dependence
Ritalin, Adderall (stimulants) - Treat ADHD; abuse potential

Research and Scientific Concepts

Gene AUTS2 - Autism susceptibility candidate 2; associated with both alcohol and heroin consumption
HTT gene - Causes Huntington’s disease; identified nearly 25 years ago but no cure yet
Oxytocin - Hormone regulating social bonding; dysregulated in both Autism and addiction; shows promise for treatment
Twin studies - Demonstrate heritability of ASD (74-98%) and genetic components of SUD
Dopamine - Neurotransmitter involved in reward; elevated by substances, gaming, and focused interest
Endorphins - Natural opioids produced by the brain; involved in self-soothing (stimming) and self-harm cycles
Butwicka et al. 2017 - First quantitative study of 26,900 individuals documenting increased substance use risk in ASD population
Protracted withdrawal - Withdrawal symptoms persisting over a year after stopping substance use

Organizations and Resources

CDC (Centers for Disease Control) - Provides statistics on substance use screening and opioid crisis
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 988
Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741
International Association for Suicide Prevention: https://www.iasp.info/resources/Crisis_Centres/

Books and Authors Referenced

Tim Page - Author with undiagnosed Asperger’s; described alcohol as addressing his neurology
Temple Grandin - Renowned Autism advocate; discussed willpower as neurologically based

Mainstreaming - Integration of Autistic children into typical educational and social settings
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) - Early intervention approach; effectiveness questioned for long-term outcomes
Masking - Autistic individuals suppressing Autistic traits to appear Neurotypical; exhausting and unsustainable
Stimming - Self-stimulatory behavior; self-soothing repetitive behavior
Literal thinking - Autistic cognitive style; takes language and instructions at face value
Special interests - Intensely focused, often narrow areas of interest characteristic of Autism
Sensory processing differences - Heightened or diminished responses to Sensory input
Executive functioning - Planning, organizing, task initiation, follow-through
Leaky gut - Disputed theory proposing intestinal permeability contributes to Autism and addiction; insufficient empirical Support
Gluten-free, casein-free (GFCF) diets - Popular in Autism communities based on endogenous opioid theory; limited evidence
Harm reduction - Public health approach emphasizing reducing harms of substance use rather than only abstinence
Deinstitutionalization laws - Prevent government facilities from admitting individuals with co-occurring intellectual/developmental disabilities
Social determination - Right of individuals to make choices about their own lives and bodies
Dignity of risk - Concept that autonomy includes accepting risks; balances safety against liberty
Self-advocacy - Individuals advocating for their own needs and rights
Neurodiversity - Framework recognizing Autism and other Neurological differences as natural human variation
Neurotypical - Individuals with typical Neurological development; non-Autistic

Criminal Justice Resources

Training programs for law enforcement on Autism recognition and appropriate interaction
Resources for navigating criminal justice involvement related to substance use

Who This Book Is For

Primary Audiences:

Clinicians and addiction treatment professionals without Autism expertise seeking to understand dual diagnoses and adapt treatment protocols
Autism specialists seeking to understand substance use vulnerability and implement screening
Families with Autistic family members, particularly adolescents or young adults, concerned about substance use vulnerability
Autistic self-advocates and adults diagnosed with Autism who suspect or know they have substance use issues
Recently diagnosed adults with Autism who are exploring their history and considering whether substance use represents self-medication for undiagnosed symptoms
Mental health professionals working with Autistic individuals on anxiety, depression, or social challenges
Educators and school counselors working with Autistic youth in transition planning

Level of Prior Knowledge Assumed:

Basic understanding of Autism spectrum disorder or willingness to learn
Familiarity with addiction/substance use concepts helpful but not required
Clinical knowledge not assumed; written accessibly for families and self-advocates

What Different Readers Might Gain:

Clinicians: Practical screening protocols, evidence-based adapted treatment approaches, understanding of why standard addiction treatment fails for Autistic individuals, specific medication considerations, and system-level recommendations for creating dual Diagnosis expertise.

Families: Understanding of why Autistic family members use substances (not moral failure), what to watch for, when to seek help, how to communicate about substance use without shame, and strategies for Support.

Autistic Individuals: Validation that substance use often represents rational coping with genuine Neurological challenges (not weakness); understanding of how Autism-specific traits affect addiction vulnerability; recognition that self-medication may address real symptoms; information on treatment approaches that work with Autistic neurology rather than against it; Support for exploring how substance use history connects to undiagnosed or recently-diagnosed Autism.

Newly Diagnosed Adults: Context for understanding their life history—how long-standing undiagnosed Autism symptoms may have driven substance use; reduced shame and self-blame through understanding neurobiology; pathway to recovery informed by both Autism and addiction understanding.

Divergent Tabletop Wiki

Explorer

Drinking Drug Use And Addiction In The Autism Community