Divergent Tabletop Wiki

Neurodiversity Studies A New Critical Paradigm

8 min readEdit

Neurodiversity Studies: a New Critical Paradigm

Understanding Neurodiversity Studies

Neurodiversity Studies represents a revolutionary shift from viewing Neurological differences as disorders to recognizing them as natural human variation. This Critical Paradigm challenges the Medical Model that pathologizes Autism, ADHD, dyslexia, and other forms of neurodivergence, instead centering Lived Experience and Neurodivergent Voices in knowledge production.

Historical Context and Critical Analysis

The concept of the “normal child” emerged only about 100 years ago, driven by compulsory schooling and mass military conscription following World War I. This historical development reveals how contemporary deficit-focused approaches to autism and ADHD are rooted in eugenics and biopower—systems of controlling populations through appeals to science—rather than objective reality.

The Child Guidance movement positioned mothers as responsible for producing “normal” children through scientific parenting advice, while simultaneously threatening institutionalization or eugenic interventions for families deemed inadequate. By mid-century, Autism emerged as a Diagnostic category through Leo Kanner’s work, much of it based on Child Guidance clinic patients.

Language and Epistemic Justice

Language Games—the rules and meanings governing communication in specific contexts—are inherently neurotypical because society is structured by neurotypical perspectives. When autistic people try to communicate within neurotypical language games, miscommunication becomes inevitable, not because of Autistic cognitive deficits, but because the rules themselves privilege neurotypical ways of thinking.

Three specific language problems distort autism research and ethics:

  1. Neurotypical language games perpetuate myths about autism caused by poor mothering, Autistic people lacking empathy, or autism involving social isolation
  2. Illogical language moves like the “broader autism phenotype” concept create logical fallacies
  3. Confusing language conflates distinct phenomena like “treating autism” versus treating co-morbidities

The Double Empathy Problem

The Double Empathy Problem describes how both Autistic and neurotypical people struggle to understand each other’s mental states—a mutual difficulty, not a one-way Autistic deficit. This framework challenges the traditional Theory of Mind deficit model that has dominated autism research.

Key differences in communication styles:

Critical Frameworks and Theories

Monotropism Theory

Monotropism posits that Autistic individuals have intensely focused (few) attentional interests versus neurotypical polytropic (many, diffuse) attention patterns. This explains differences in:

This isn’t a deficit but a different organization of attention and interest that can enable expertise and systematic learning.

Value-Neutral Disability Model

Elizabeth Barnes’s value-neutral model of disability offers resolution to dilemmas in Neurodiversity theory: disability is value-neutral regarding global wellbeing (overall life satisfaction) while acknowledging local bads (specific ways life is harder).

Empirical research supports this:

Neuroqueering and Crip Theory

Neuroqueering involves unsettling power structures in normative spaces by queering assumptions about what counts as “normal” or “functional.” Crip theory centers disabled and Neurodivergent people’s own analysis of justice and what enables flourishing.

These frameworks draw parallels to feminist studies, critical race theory, and queer studies, which similarly challenged universal claims about human nature.

Ethical Considerations

Prevention and Cure Ethics

Prevention and cure of autism rest on unexamined assumptions that persist even within traditional medical ethics frameworks. Key ethical concerns include:

Epistemic Authority and Knowledge Production

Epistemic justice requires recognizing neurodivergent people as authoritative sources of knowledge about their own experiences. The biomedical model pathologizes while community frameworks enable self-determination.

Autistic scholars bring logical rigor helping identify language confusions and false beliefs embedded in mainstream research. Their less convention-bound thinking styles provide epistemic advantages in identifying logical fallacies and questioning assumptions.

Practical Applications and Strategies

Institutional Change and Universal Design

Rather than “fixing” Autistic individuals to conform to neurotypical norms, modify institutions’ social practices. This includes:

  1. Universal design Accommodations automatically provided
  2. Neurodiversity education for all staff
  3. Explicit cultural transmission of institutional norms
  4. Sensory accommodations without judgment

Developing Skills Through Peer Communities

Effective skill development emerges through peer interaction around activities rather than isolated “skills training.” Key elements include:

Explicit Instructions and Structured Mentorship

Neurodivergent people are “good at following algorithms” but need the algorithm spelled out. This applies across contexts:

Monitoring for Cognitive-Affective Overload

Detail-focused Neurodivergent people can appear endlessly capable, masking stress and anxiety until sudden breakdown. Proactive monitoring includes:

Communication and Social Understanding

Alternative Communication Forms

Neurodivergent people develop alternative forms of communication beyond neurotypical language when linguistic frameworks prove inadequate:

Silence often reflects translation difficulty, not absence of experience.

Cross-Neurotype Communication

Better cross-neurotype understanding requires:

Identity and Self-Understanding

Neurodivergent Identity Development

Neurodivergent identity involves recognizing Autism or other Neurological differences as integral to personhood rather than separable pathology. Jim Sinclair’s foundational statement that “autism is a way of being…it colors every experience…it is not possible to separate the autism from the person” establishes this framework.

Strategic Disclosure and Safety

While Neurodiversity frameworks advocate for inclusion and accommodation, existing Stigma—particularly around ADHD, dyslexia, and Tourette’s—means strategic disclosure is often necessary for legal protection and support access.

Community Knowledge and Epistemological Traveling

Epistemological traveling involves moving deliberately between academic frameworks, professional discourse, and community knowledge to find understandings resonating with lived experience. This includes engaging with:

Mental Health and Emotional Wellbeing

Understanding Co-Morbidities

The Neurodiversity paradigm does not reject treatment of co-morbidities like:

The distinction lies in treating genuine problems versus attempting to eliminate neurodivergence itself.

Burnout and Masking

Masking—the exhausting effort to hide Autistic traits and appear neurotypical—extracts enormous cognitive and emotional costs invisible to observers. This hypervigilance can lead to:

Mental Health Support

Professional mental health support remains vital for many Neurodivergent people. The framework advocates for:

Education and Work

Inclusive Educational Practices

Transforming educational environments requires:

Workplace Accommodations

Inclusive workplaces implement:

Career Development

Effective career development for Neurodivergent people includes:

Research and Knowledge Production

Participatory Autism Research

The Participatory Autism Research Collective (PARC) exemplifies how autistic-led initiatives determine research agendas and methodologies. These spaces are crucial for validating Autistic knowledge and enabling collaboration.

Research Justice

Research justice demands:

Community Knowledge Production

Community epistemology recognizes that:

Activism and Advocacy

Neurodiversity Rights

Neurodiversity rights activism parallels disability rights movements, demanding:

Intersectional Neurodiversity

Intersectionality requires recognizing how neurodivergence intersects with:

Advocacy Strategies

Effective advocacy includes:

Resources and Support

Professional Support

Finding affirmative professionals who:

  • Question deficit-based approaches
  • Recognize Neurodivergent experience as valid
  • Collaborate with clients in defining problems and solutions
  • Maintain awareness of power dynamics in therapeutic relationships

Community Resources

Autistic-led organizations and neurodivergent communities provide:

Educational Materials

Learning about neurodiversity includes:

Future Directions

Emerging Research

Future research directions include:

Institutional Transformation

Systemic change requires:

Cultural Shift

Cultural change involves: