Divergent Tabletop Wiki

Experiences Of Adults Following An Autism Diagnosis

27 min readEdit

Experiences of Adults Following an Autism Diagnosis

Overview

This phenomenological study examines how 22 Autistic adults experience and make meaning of their autism Diagnosis, moving beyond clinical definitions to explore Diagnosis as a lived reality. Rather than treating Autism as a purely neurobiological condition, the research investigates what Diagnosis means subjectively—how it reshapes identity, explains lifelong struggles, and enables self-understanding. The book challenges deficit-based models while acknowledging the genuine challenges Autistic adults face, emphasizing that understanding Autistic people’s own interpretations of their experiences is essential for ethical engagement with Neurodivergent populations.

Understanding Autism As Multi-Layered Meaning

Autism operates simultaneously at multiple levels that require different analytical frameworks. At the clinical level, DSM-5 criteria define it through persistent deficits in Social communication and restricted/Repetitive behaviors, though these definitions have evolved significantly since Leo Kanner’s 1943 description. The popular cultural understanding of autism carries connotations shaped by media representation, often emphasizing stereotypes that don’t reflect lived experience. The cultural layer recognizes that autism’s significance varies historically and geographically—what constitutes pathology in one culture may be unremarkable in another.

Critically, autism is not a singular biological phenomenon but rather multiple underlying Neurological or cognitive conditions that may present similarly behaviorally. Genetic variations associated with autism appear commonly in Neurotypical populations, and evidence increasingly suggests autism results from interactions between genetic and environmental factors rather than a single cause. This heterogeneity means no single person completely embodies all Diagnostic criteria, and the danger lies in allowing the Diagnostic label to become the sole lens through which a person is understood.

The research employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), a methodology that centers participants’ own interpretations of their experiences as valid data. This approach explicitly rejects the dismissal of Autistic self-reflection as inherently unreliable, instead valuing first-person accounts as essential information for understanding autism’s ethical and philosophical implications.

Executive Dysfunction: Knowledge-Behavior Gap

Many Autistic adults report a fundamental and persistent gap between intellectual understanding and behavioral execution. They cognitively understand what they should do (sleep hygiene, stopping activities, meeting deadlines) yet cannot execute these behaviors despite years of awareness and motivation. This gap—often persisting 20-30 years since adolescence—indicates genuinely Neurological rather than motivational causes.

For example, one participant (Kris) experiences profound difficulty stopping activities once started. When researching topics or working in specific modes (welding, gaming), he cannot interrupt despite knowing he needs sleep, becoming increasingly active as evening progresses and sleeping only 3 hours nightly. He acknowledges he will “crash again” but remains unable to modify the pattern despite perfect understanding of sleep hygiene principles. Another participant (Mickey) describes being in a “mode” where he simply cannot stop until exhaustion takes over.

This represents a critical distinction: it is not a willpower deficit or motivational problem but a neurological barrier to behavioral inhibition. Therapeutic approaches emphasizing willpower or behavioral contracts without addressing underlying processing differences are inherently ineffective for this population.

Sleep Disturbance and Circadian Dysregulation

Sleep problems are nearly universal among Autistic adults and often persist for decades with significant distress. The evening activation pattern—becoming increasingly mentally or physically active as evening progresses—contradicts conventional sleep advice and suggests neurological causes rather than purely behavioral causes. This creates vicious cycles: sleep deprivation impairs daytime functioning, yet participants remain unable to modify evening behavior despite awareness of consequences and substantial motivation.

This pattern differs from typical insomnia or anxiety-driven sleep problems and may reflect fundamental differences in circadian regulation. Without recognition of this Neurological component, standard sleep hygiene advice proves ineffective and can increase frustration and self-blame.

Anxiety, Worry, and Loss of Control

Participants report pervasive anxiety affecting multiple life domains, often characterized by difficulty regulating worry and loss of overview creating disproportionate distress. One participant describes worrying “about everything”—the world, loved ones, herself, changes, unpredictable events—while absorbing others’ suffering indiscriminately. After consuming emotionally heavy media, she had to stop watching news and Holocaust documentaries because the emotional weight became unbearable. She describes her experience as a mind like “a radio playing” that she cannot turn off.

Another participant (Vic) panics when losing overview; a single disruption (forgetting to put on his ring, getting dressed slowly) can derail his entire day’s plan, creating cascading anxiety. For others, the anxiety centers existentially on unpredictability, change itself, and loss of control. This anxiety is not simple worry but often paralyzing and pervasive, sometimes contributing to suicidal ideation or applications for assisted dying.

The existential quality of this anxiety—fear of the unknown, incomprehensibility of one’s own invisible suffering to others—distinguishes it from typical Anxiety disorders and may require different treatment approaches that address both the emotional intensity and the underlying need for predictability and control.

Suicidality and Mental Health Crisis

Multiple participants have experienced suicidal ideation or attempts, with diagnoses occurring in contexts of previous psychiatric crisis. One participant (Robyn) attempted suicide at age 12 while transitioning to a large middle school, discovering she was fundamentally different from peers. She spent her entire youth in psychiatric institutions. Multiple other participants (Baukis, Els, Nora) considered or attempted suicide, and one participant (Marie) escalated to applying for euthanasia (Belgium permits this for “unbearable psychological suffering”) after psychiatric hospitalization left her feeling more misunderstood and isolated.

A critical pattern emerges: psychiatric settings that miss autism Diagnosis and instead focus on personality disorders, psychosis, or behavioral control can intensify suffering through inappropriate treatment. Marie’s experience illustrates this danger. Diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and subjected to group Therapy she experienced as damaging, she began considering euthanasia. Only during the euthanasia application process was autism suggested, leading her to delay proceedings to pursue autism-specific support. Her case demonstrates how inadequate mental healthcare compounds suffering for undiagnosed Autistic people.

For others (Nora, age 28, diagnosed at 21), suicide ideation persisting since age 6 has shifted from active planning to fantasy use as “escape mechanism during difficult moments.” The pattern suggests that undiagnosed autism in contexts of social isolation, inability to meet Neurotypical expectations, and unvalidated suffering creates genuine mental health risks that autism Diagnosis and appropriate Support can meaningfully address.

Social Isolation and the Loneliness Paradox

Many Autistic adults experience acute loneliness paradoxically alongside desire for social connection. One participant states: “I love the people very much but I just can’t maintain the contact. I think that’s very sad because I’m quite lonely.” Another emphasizes that not all autists are asocial; he needs social contact but struggles profoundly with establishing and maintaining relationships, leading to “existential loneliness.” He feels like “the odd one out” even within autism communities.

A third participant (Kris) never felt belonging despite physical presence in groups (football club, work, friendships), always sensing he was the outsider—a feeling that “has always been present very strongly.” He “never really fully felt at home” and “never really belonged to the group.” This contrasts with participants who report less need for social contact and feel little genuine loss when people leave, describing themselves as having “a different feeling of connectedness” rather than lacking one.

This heterogeneity is important: autism does not uniformly produce antisociality or reduced need for connection. Rather, it produces varied social capacities, desires, and difficulties. Some Autistic people struggle profoundly to maintain relationships they very much want; others prefer less frequent social contact; some experience mutual understanding challenges; others navigate relationships successfully. Understanding this diversity prevents overgeneralizations about Autistic “social deficits.”

Diagnostic Testing: Theory-Driven Rather Than Criteria-based

The diagnostic process typically includes cognitive tests reflecting specific autism theories rather than DSM-5 Diagnostic criteria. Tests commonly used include: IQ Assessment (WAIS IV), attention/memory tests (Bourdon-Vos, Stroop Color-Word, Rey’s 15-word list, Rey Complex Figure), executive function tests (Tower of London, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), and Theory of Mind tests (“Reading the Mind in the Eye,” Happé’s Strange Stories).

Critically, these tests (central coherence, executive functions, Theory of Mind) reflect specific theoretical frameworks about autism causation rather than the DSM-5’s behavioral and social-communication criteria. For example, the Rey Complex Figure test measures whether someone draws an outline first (indicating central coherence) or focuses on details—reflecting weak central coherence theory. One participant’s bicycle drawing from left to right was considered deviant because Neurotypical people supposedly draw both wheels first, then details. Yet the test determines Diagnostic conclusions despite measuring theoretical constructs, not DSM-5 criteria.

This creates what participants call “tautological testing”: research shows Autistic people score differently on these tests, so they’re used diagnostively, but this proves the theory rather than autism itself. Professionals rarely explain test rationales or how results connect to Diagnosis, leaving Diagnosis feeling mysterious. Additionally, diagnosticians struggle to distinguish autism from overlapping constructs (high sensitivity, OCPD, personality disorders) despite lacking scientific criteria. One participant (Tatiana) criticizes psychiatry’s conflation of concepts: high sensitivity versus autism, yet psychiatry cannot distinguish them scientifically. If someone is diagnosed with autism rather than HSP, it’s because HSP is a “personality trait” not a “disorder”—circular logic rather than scientific differentiation.

Diagnosis as Explanation and Liberation

For most participants, the autism Diagnosis provided profound relief by reframing lifelong struggles as Neurological rather than personal failures. One participant (Albert) spent his life feeling like an “alien” for not being able to network; the Diagnosis taught him he has “a different brain structure and a different way of thinking” with Neurological limitations he can respect rather than despise.

Another participant (BartDelam) describes the Diagnosis as literally life-saving—before Diagnosis, he had suicidal thoughts during driving, feeling the wheel pull toward trees. The Diagnosis provided explanation for Depression caused by exhaustion and enabled him to seek appropriate Support. He notes: “Since the Diagnosis, I can finally really be who I am. I used to think that I was myself, but that wasn’t true.” Previously, he unconsciously performed “normality” to meet expectations; now he understands he cannot and need not conform. The Diagnosis also changed his temporal orientation—he moved from ruminating about the past or anxiously preparing the future to experiencing “here and now.”

This therapeutic mechanism operates through legitimization. Rather than explaining all struggles (participants acknowledge trauma, context, and ongoing challenges), Diagnosis explains why certain efforts chronically fail and permits gentleness toward oneself. It shifts attribution from personal inadequacy to Neurological reality, enabling both self-compassion and strategic action.

Acceptance, Mourning, and Identity Integration

The Diagnosis’s positive effects coexist with loss and require integration. One participant (Hannah) initially believed effort could overcome any limitation (“if I just try hard enough, I’ll make it”), but the Diagnosis confirmed she “will never make it” and “simply can’t do” Neurotypical tasks (managing household, children, societal bustle). This represents grieving the possible self.

Another participant (Nora) initially resisted testing because Diagnosis felt like surrender—after 15 years consciously trying to be like her Neurotypical siblings, a label felt like confirmation she would “never be like your brother or sister, because there’s something ‘wrong’ with you,” negating all effort. Multiple participants explicitly experienced mourning (per Kübler-Ross stages: denial, anger, bargaining, Depression, acceptance).

Yet this acceptance also enables self-compassion. One participant (Baukis), raised by demanding gifted parents where a 9/10 grade prompted questions about the missing point, scaled back perfectionism after Diagnosis. She realized her difficulties dated from after her eating disorder resolved, suggesting Neurodevelopmental rather than trauma-only origins. The Diagnosis permitted releasing impossible standards.

The key is that integration involves both acknowledgment of real limitations and maintenance of agency. Rather than accepting a “disorder” or “life sentence,” participants prefer understanding the Diagnosis as describing “being different” rather than “being disordered.” The Diagnosis works therapeutically when it permits gentleness toward oneself while maintaining capacity to understand situations differently and improve where possible.

Communication Differences As Alternative Validity

Autistic individuals often experience a fundamental mismatch between their rich inner experiences and ability to express them through spoken language. One participant (Bas) describes his inner experiences as “so rich that you can’t just simply start explaining it in Dutch,” noting that music functions as an alternative language where “the medium is the message itself.” Diagnostic processes often misinterpret this communication difference as evidence of limited inner experiences—one Diagnostic report stated he has “very limited inner experiences” when his rich experiences simply cannot be adequately expressed in Dutch.

Participants emphasize that different forms of meaningful communication—including drawings, music, dance, written expression, visual arrangement—are equally valid and important. Many participants write extensively: one blogs about autism, another documented Diagnostic experiences, another started at age 10 and filled space under her bed by age 60. As one notes, writing functions as a “social prosthesis,” helping build bridges with the outside world and integrate the Diagnostic label with other identities.

Non-linguistic communication carries particular depth. One participant communicated relationship dynamics using emotion-labeled cards arranged in constellations—a method she describes as “so precisely and clearly that they started to make sense,” far exceeding typical verbal explanation. Yet Diagnostic processes often dismiss non-linguistic communication as insufficient evidence of inner experience, pathologizing difference rather than recognizing alternative validity.

The assumption that inability to articulate something means inability to experience or think about it is fundamentally incorrect. This affects Diagnosis, Therapy, and social relationships: professionals and loved ones often underestimate Autistic people’s cognitive sophistication and inner richness because expression differs from Neurotypical norms.

Theory of Mind and Social Understanding As Learnable Process

The prevailing theory that Autistic people have deficient Theory of Mind (inability to understand others’ perspectives) is contradicted by participant accounts. While understanding may not happen intuitively or automatically, participants demonstrate they can learn to understand others’ perspectives through deliberate effort and explanation. Multiple participants describe engaging in extensive cognitive work to figure out what others think and feel.

This suggests that for some Autistic individuals, Theory of Mind is not absent but rather “not naturally” developed—it’s a learnable skill requiring more conscious processing. One participant notes that translation between “the NT world and the autism world” would be helpful, suggesting mutual understanding requires both parties to adjust expectations and explicitly clarify their different thinking patterns. Social misunderstandings often stem from dynamics affecting all people rather than autism-specific deficits.

Regarding empathy specifically, participants demonstrate significant capacity for understanding others and caring about relationships. The difference is that understanding doesn’t happen automatically but requires deliberate cognitive work and often explicit explanation. This is not absence of empathy but differently-resourced empathy. One participant describes being “open to other people, and letting other people be who they are and helping them” as her understanding of sociality. Another works as a mystery shopper in a role typically assumed incompatible with autism, demonstrating that Autistic individuals can be socially engaged and professionally competent in unexpected fields.

Sensory Overstimulation and Real-World Impact

Multiple participants describe sensory overstimulation as a significant daily challenge, not a minor inconvenience. One participant (Sofie) describes an extreme sensitivity response: when overstimulated, she experiences an immediate jump from “zero to ten” with no middle ground, making emotional regulation extremely difficult. When someone taps their fingers, she can only think “stop it, stop it, stop it” and cannot modulate her response. She sought help from an autism coach to learn to recognize early signs of overstimulation and anticipate her threshold before reaching crisis.

This binary quality—jumping from comfortable to overwhelmed with little middle ground—distinguishes Autistic Sensory sensitivity from typical sensitivity and makes self-regulation extremely difficult without specific coping strategies. Effective Support requires understanding the intensity and binary nature of Sensory responses rather than treating Sensory needs as preferences or quirks.

Detail-Orientation As Different Perspective, Not Deficiency

Autistic individuals’ focus on details is often pathologized as “weak central coherence,” but participants question this framing. One participant (Bas) argues that perceiving what others miss isn’t detail-orientation—it’s perceiving “the heart of the matter.” When he notices a musical note played in a particular way at a concert, he questions why noticing this is considered deficient when Neurotypical concertgoers focus on details like the concert hall bar. He inverts the stereotype: perhaps Neurotypical people are detail-oriented (focusing on superficial context cues), while he focuses on substance.

This reframing suggests the issue isn’t how Autistic people process information but rather that society privileges superficial contextual processing over deep, specific attention. The intensity of perceiving reality and thinking through it “far more intensely than what is socially accepted” can be advantageous in certain contexts and should be accommodated rather than pathologized.

Disability As Relational, Not Individual

Participants repeatedly note that problems attributed to autism are often contextual. One participant (Vic) explains that he only feels disabled in certain circumstances—when his carefully structured life is disrupted by unexpected social demands. With a peaceful, predictable life, he feels fine. This suggests that “disability” is not purely individual but relational—dependent on environmental demands matching individual capacity.

The dominant cultural expectation that “everything must progress quickly” may be incompatible with Autistic thinking, which dwells on details and requires more processing time. BartDelam notes the core issue may be information-processing speed: Autistic thought processes take longer (compared to Neurotypical “motorways,” Autistic thought uses “little roads with detours”), but modern society’s demands are incompatible with this pace. Rather than trying to make Autistic people faster, society might benefit from making space for people who need more time to think through issues thoroughly.

Using Diagnosis as a Thinking Tool Without Determinism

Carl’s approach of holding the Diagnosis lightly—using it as a thinking tool without being enslaved by it—provides a productive model. Rather than accepting the Diagnosis as a life sentence or rejecting it entirely, this involves strategic deployment: the Diagnosis can help orient attention (“I must be careful of that”) but becomes problematic if taken deterministically (“I will always react this way”). The distinction between “being different” and “being Autistic” is vital: autism is one characteristic among many, not the totality of identity.

How to apply it: When facing a challenge, ask whether it relates to autism-specific processing differences or stems from other causes (trauma, context, temporary stress). Use autism understanding to inform strategy without treating it as destiny. Develop “helping thoughts” (as one participant named them)—signposts for your particular thinking style that provide frameworks without limiting possibility.

Developing Recognition-Based Intervention for Sensory Overstimulation

For those experiencing binary Sensory responses (jumping from comfortable to overwhelmed), working with a coach or therapist to develop early-warning recognition systems can prevent crisis escalation. The goal is learning to recognize subtle early signs of overstimulation and anticipate the threshold before reaching the point where emotional regulation becomes impossible.

How to apply it: Track patterns of overstimulation over 2-3 weeks to identify early warning signs (subtle physical sensations, internal restlessness, changes in thought patterns). Create an early-intervention plan for when these signs appear—this might involve physical space changes, sound reduction, structured break time, or other Sensory adjustments. Communicate this plan to people in your environment who might notice signs earlier than you do.

Separating Executive Dysfunction from Willpower Deficits

Recognizing that Executive dysfunction represents a Neurological barrier rather than willpower deficit changes intervention strategies entirely. Rather than relying on self-discipline or behavioral contracts (which are ineffective), strategies should involve external structure, environmental modification, and acceptance of Neurological limitations.

How to apply it: For persistent behavioral patterns (like sleep timing), experiment with environmental changes rather than behavioral effort: Can you change your evening environment to reduce stimulation? Use external alarms or time-locks rather than relying on internal stopping? Identify patterns in what activities are most hyperfocus-prone and either build in external interruption or redirect the hyperfocus to valued activities. Most importantly, stop interpreting inability to change patterns as personal failure—it’s a Neurological limitation requiring systems-level accommodation, not willpower.

Creating Workable Identity Integration Post-Diagnosis

For adults diagnosed after decades of masking or compensation, identity reconstruction is necessary and requires deliberate work. Rather than trying to determine the “true self” under the mask, the more functional question is understanding which patterns serve you and which don’t, then choosing accordingly.

How to apply it: Create a timeline mapping your life’s major events, relationships, and shifts in how you presented yourself. Identify which adaptive behaviors developed from autism compensation, which from trauma or circumstance, which from deliberate choice. For each major adaptation, ask: “Does this still serve me? Do I want to continue this?” This isn’t about recovering a “true self” but rather conscious choice about who you want to be going forward. Some compensatory strategies may be worth keeping; others may be worth releasing.

Leveraging Non-Linguistic Communication Modalities

If spoken language communication feels limited compared to your inner experience, experiment with alternative modes: writing, drawing, music, visual arrangement, movement. These aren’t secondary to “real” communication; they carry validity and often express nuance that language cannot.

How to apply it: Identify which modalities feel most natural for expressing your experience. Use these in self-reflection (journaling for processing, drawing for understanding patterns), in relationships (sharing music that expresses how you feel rather than only verbal explanation), and in professional settings where possible (asking if you can provide written responses instead of speaking, creating visual representations of your ideas). Build coalitions with people who value alternative communication—this validates its worth and opens new possibilities.

Strategic Disclosure With Preparation

If considering disclosure to employers or social circles, strategic preparation increases likelihood of positive outcomes and reduces social prejudice effects. Disclosure without preparation often triggers stereotyping and lowered expectations, even when unnecessary.

How to apply it: Before disclosing, prepare concrete information about what specific accommodations you need and why (framed in terms of productivity and effectiveness, not deficiency). Identify what you can do well and want continued opportunities for. If disclosing to employers, present it as “here’s what helps me perform optimally” rather than “here’s what I can’t do.” Consider disclosing to only necessary people rather than broadly. Find allies (particularly other Autistic people or neurodivergence-informed professionals) who can reinforce positive framing if others respond with stereotyping.

Establishing Effective Coaching Relationships

Quality autism coaching varies significantly and depends less on formal credentials than on approach and personality. The most valued Support comes from coaches who: understand autism as difference rather than deficiency; are “solution-oriented” (starting with what works); provide explanation and translation between Autistic and Neurotypical worlds; respect autonomy and individual variation; and possess both knowledge and humility about limitations of that knowledge.

How to apply it: Interview potential coaches with these questions: How do they understand autism (as Neurological difference or disorder)? What’s their approach to problem-solving? Can they explain how Neurotypical people perceive Autistic behavior (crucial for navigating social situations)? Do they respect your autonomy in deciding which changes matter to you? Have they worked with Autistic adults (not just children)? Consider seeking coaches who are Autistic themselves—they often provide irreplaceable insights about lived experience.

Key Takeaways

  1. Autism is Multi-Layered Meaning Requiring Different Analytical Approaches: Clinical Diagnosis, popular culture, historical context, and individual lived experience represent distinct frameworks. No single biological explanation likely accounts for all autism presentations. Understanding what Diagnosis means subjectively to individuals is as important as understanding neurobiological mechanisms for ethical engagement with Autistic people.

  2. Phenomenological Understanding of Lived Experience Is Essential, Not Optional: First-person accounts of Autistic experience are valid data sources, not unreliable self-reports. Autistic people can credibly recount their own experiences, and understanding subjective meaning-making reveals what Diagnosis actually means for identity, coping, and psychological well-being.

  3. Executive dysfunction Represents Genuine Neurological Barrier, Not Willpower Deficit: The persistent gap between intellectual knowledge and behavioral execution—persisting 20-30 years despite awareness and motivation—indicates Neurological rather than motivational causes. This reframes therapeutic approach from behavioral willpower-based contracts to systems-level accommodation.

  4. Diagnosis Provides Therapeutic Relief Through Legitimization and Permission for Self-Compassion: Diagnosis works therapeutically not by explaining all struggles but by reframing lifelong failure as Neurological fact rather than personal inadequacy, enabling both self-understanding and strategic action. This permits gentleness toward oneself while maintaining agency to understand situations differently and improve where possible.

  5. Communication Differences Are Not Communication Deficits; Alternative Modalities Carry Equal Validity: Autistic individuals often possess rich inner experiences and sophisticated thoughts but struggle to express them through Neurotypical spoken language. Music, drawing, written expression, and visual arrangement carry full validity as communication and often express nuance that language cannot.

  6. Diagnosis Amplifies Existential Questions About Identity When Diagnosis Follows Decades of Masking: Adults diagnosed after successfully compensating throughout their lives face the identity crisis: “If I’ve been imitating behavior my entire life, who am I really?” This requires deliberate work to distinguish between adaptive survival mechanisms and authentic self-expression, ultimately reframing as conscious choice rather than recovery of a “true self.”

  7. Autism Diagnosis Can Prevent Mental Health Crisis but Only If Recognized Before Psychiatric Hospitalization Creates Compounding Damage: Undiagnosed autism in contexts of social isolation and unvalidated suffering creates genuine mental health risks. However, psychiatric settings missing autism Diagnosis and focusing on personality disorders or behavioral control can intensify suffering through inappropriate treatment, potentially escalating to suicidality or euthanasia applications.

  8. Current Diagnostic Testing Measures Theoretical Constructs Rather Than DSM-5 Criteria, Creating Scientific Circularity: Tests measuring central coherence, executive functions, and Theory of Mind reflect specific autism theories rather than behavioral/social-communication criteria. This creates tautological testing where different patterns prove the theory rather than autism itself, leaving patients confused about why particular tests determine Diagnosis.

  9. Theory of Mind and Empathy Deficits Are Overstated; Autistic Individuals Possess Significant Capacity for Understanding Others Through Different Processes: Understanding doesn’t happen automatically but develops through deliberate cognitive work and explicit explanation—a difference in process, not absence. This is not deficiency but differently-resourced empathy, and Autistic people successfully navigate relationships, teach, lead, and provide care across all domains.

  10. Disability Is Relational, Not Individual; Environmental Demands Must Match Individual Processing Capacity: Problems attributed to autism often reflect contextual mismatch rather than pure individual deficit. One participant feels disabled only when predictable life structure is disrupted by sudden social demands; with predictable life, he feels fine. Society’s demands for rapid processing are incompatible with deeper, slower thinking styles.

  11. Disclosure Triggers Social Prejudice Despite Legitimate Need for Accommodations, Creating Painful Catch-22: Telling employers, colleagues, or acquaintances about autism often backfires into infantilization, task removal, and lowered expectations, even when the person has demonstrated successful performance. Strategic disclosure with preparation increases positive outcomes; blanket disclosure often creates new disabilities through triggered stereotyping.

  12. Responsibility Persists Despite Neurological Difference; Diagnosis Enables Agency Rather Than Eliminating It: Understanding Neurological limitations justifies accommodations and enables appropriate Support, but Diagnosis does not excuse harmful behavior or eliminate personal agency. The productive stance is maintaining both self-compassion for genuine difficulties and commitment to responsible action: “No excuses, but interpretation.”

Critical Warnings & Important Notes

Mental Health Crisis Risk in Undiagnosed and Misdiagnosed Autistic Adults

Multiple participants in this study have experienced suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or euthanasia applications. While autism itself is not inherently associated with suicidality, undiagnosed autism in contexts of lifelong unmet needs and psychiatric hospitalization that misses autism Diagnosis can create severe mental health crisis. Critically, psychiatric hospitalization that misses autism and attributes struggles to personality disorders, psychosis, or behavioral problems may intensify suffering rather than helping. Marie’s path illustrates this danger: diagnosed with borderline personality disorder and subjected to group Therapy she experienced as harmful, she escalated to euthanasia application. Only during euthanasia proceedings was autism suggested; recognizing autism enabled hope and redirected toward appropriate Support.

Warning: If you are Autistic or suspect autism and have experienced suicidal ideation or psychiatric hospitalization, seek professionals specifically trained in autism. General psychiatric frameworks may pathologize autism-related differences and apply inappropriate treatment.

Diagnostic Process Limitations and Theory-embedding

Current Diagnostic testing embeds specific autism theories (central coherence, executive functions, Theory of Mind) rather than measuring DSM-5 behavioral criteria. This means: (1) Diagnostic conclusions may rest partly on theoretical assumptions rather than clear criteria, (2) professionals often cannot clearly explain why specific tests determine autism, (3) distinction from overlapping conditions lacks scientific basis, and (4) Diagnosis may feel mysterious or arbitrary to recipients.

Important: While Diagnosis provides important relief and access to Support for many participants, the current Diagnostic process has significant limitations. Diagnosis should be sought from professionals experienced with Autistic adults and preferably able to explain the rationale for specific tests and conclusions.

Disclosure Carries Material Costs; Strategic Choice Is Justified

Disclosing autism Diagnosis to employers, colleagues, or acquaintances often triggers stereotyping, task removal, and lowered expectations, even when the person has demonstrated competence. This creates a painful catch-22: disclosure is necessary for legitimate accommodations but risks creating new barriers through triggered prejudice.

Important: Non-disclosure is not shame; it’s protective and strategic. Those considering disclosure should prepare concrete information about specific needs and capabilities beforehand, consider disclosing only to necessary people rather than broadly, and ideally have allies who can reinforce positive framing if others respond with stereotyping.

Identity Crisis Post-Diagnosis May Require Professional Support

Adults diagnosed after decades of masking or compensation face genuine existential crisis: “If I’ve been adapting my entire life, who am I really?” This is not a problem to be resolved quickly or simply. Some participants describe this as necessary developmental work; others required Therapy to navigate identity reconstruction.

Important: If you’re experiencing identity confusion post-Diagnosis, this is normal and understandable, not pathology. Professional Support from therapists experienced with late-diagnosed autism can help distinguish between adaptive survival mechanisms and authentic preferences going forward.

Sensory Overstimulation Can Create Crisis States; Early Recognition Is Essential

For participants experiencing binary Sensory responses (jumping from comfortable to overwhelmed), overstimulation can create Emotional dysregulation making typical coping impossible. Early recognition of warning signs and external intervention are essential; waiting for internal regulation or self-soothing is insufficient once threshold is exceeded.

Important: If you experience binary Sensory responses, work with professionals to develop early-warning recognition systems and create intervention plans activating before crisis threshold. Communication with others about your patterns and needs can enable external Support.

This Book Primarily Reflects Flanders/netherlands Context and 2016 Timeframe

The study examined 22 adults in Flanders and Netherlands in 2016, some diagnosed under DSM-IV, others DSM-5. Experiences and Diagnostic frameworks may vary geographically and temporally. Additionally, the study examined only individuals aware of their autism Diagnosis, potentially biasing toward those who experienced relatively positive Diagnosis experiences.

Important: While core themes may generalize, specific Diagnostic criteria, professional practice, and cultural attitudes toward neurodivergence vary significantly across regions and have evolved since 2016. Seek current, locally-relevant professional guidance.

Non-Linguistic Communication Validity May Not Be Recognized in Professional Settings

While this book emphasizes alternative communication modalities’ validity, Diagnostic professionals and therapists often dismiss non-linguistic communication as insufficient evidence of inner experience, insisting on verbal expression. This pathologizes difference rather than recognizing validity.

Important: If alternative communication (writing, music, visual representation) feels more authentic to your experience than spoken language, this is valid. Seek professionals who recognize this validity rather than insisting on linguistic-only expression. Self-advocacy for your communication needs is important.

This Book Does Not Provide Mental Health Treatment; Professional Support Is Crucial for Those with Suicidal Ideation, Trauma, or Severe Mental Health Conditions

While this book documents lived experiences including mental health crisis, it is not a mental health treatment resource. Those experiencing suicidal ideation, severe anxiety, Depression, or trauma require professional mental health Support from qualified providers.

Critical: If you are experiencing suicidal thoughts, contact emergency services or crisis resources. If seeking mental health Support, specifically request providers experienced with autism to avoid the misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment patterns documented in this book.

Resources and Support

For those seeking more information or Support, consider these reputable resources: