Declarative Language Handbook Using A Thoughtful Language Style To Help Kids With Social Learning Challenges Feel Competent Connected And Understood

Executive Summary

The Declarative Language Handbook introduces a transformative communication framework that shifts from demanding imperative language to inviting declarative language. This approach prioritizes neurological safety, competence, and independence for neurodivergent individuals by reducing threat responses and enabling access to higher-level thinking. The core insight: how we speak fundamentally affects the nervous system’s ability to process information, learn, and connect with others.

Understanding Declarative Vs. Imperative Language

The Fundamental Difference

The handbook distinguishes between two language modes that dramatically impact learning and connection. Imperative language includes commands, questions, and demands that trigger the brain’s threat detection system, activating defensive responses that shut down learning. This includes direct orders like “Do this now” as well as questions that create performance pressure, even well-intentioned ones like “What should you be doing?”

Declarative language comprises statements, observations, and invitations that maintain neurological safety. These include “I notice it’s time for lunch” or “I see trash on the floor” rather than commands. The key is sharing information without demanding immediate response, allowing space for processing and autonomous decision-making.

Why Questions Are Not Declarative

A crucial insight challenges conventional wisdom: questions are NOT declarative language, even open-ended ones. All questions place processing demands and create performance pressure that can trigger anxiety and shutdown. The handbook provides clear conversion strategies:

Replace “What should we do?” with “I’m wondering what we could do”
Replace “Can you help?” with “I’m thinking maybe you could help”
Replace “Do you understand?” with “I’m not sure if that was clear enough”

This subtle shift removes the burden to perform while still inviting engagement and thought.

The Science Behind Language Choice

Imperative language activates the amygdala and threat detection system, triggering fight-flight-freeze responses that shut down access to the prefrontal cortex—the brain’s center for higher-level thinking and problem-solving. Declarative language maintains neurological safety by sharing information without demands, allowing full access to cognitive abilities and supporting the development of independent thinking rather than mere obedience.

Constructing Effective Declarative Statements

Key Components

The handbook provides practical building blocks for declarative language. Observational comments form the foundation: simple statements of fact like “The dog looks hungry,” “Your backpack is by the door,” or “I see crayons on the table.” These observations share information without directing action.

Cognitive verbs invite thinking and mental processing: “I’m wondering if…” “I remember when…” “I’m deciding whether to…” and “I notice that…” These verbs explicitly model internal cognitive processes that neurodivergent individuals may struggle to recognize intuitively.

Words of possibility and uncertainty create space for exploration: maybe, might, possibly, perhaps, sometimes, could, probably. Statements like “Maybe we could try a different way” introduce flexibility without pressure. Transparent uncertainty admits when adults don’t know: “I’m not sure about that,” “I don’t know either,” or “That’s a hard one—I need to think.” This modeling reduces perfectionism and shows that uncertainty is manageable.

Implementation Example

Instead of demanding compliance through commands like “Clean up your room,” declarative language invites problem-solving: “I notice clothes on the floor and I’m wondering if we should put them in the hamper.” This shifts the dynamic from obedience to collaboration, supporting the development of internal motivation rather than external compliance.

Visual Referencing: Beyond Eye Contact

Understanding the Difference

The handbook distinguishes between traditional eye contact training and visual referencing. Eye contact is taught as a rote behavioral skill—performance-based with limited generalizability to real-world situations. Visual referencing is the dynamic ability to use sight to gather information about one’s environment and communication partners—context-dependent and essential for genuine social competence.

Many neurodivergent individuals struggle with sustained eye contact, which can feel invasive or overwhelming. However, they can develop visual referencing skills that serve the actual functional purpose of gathering information for social interaction and learning.

Building Visual Referencing Naturally

Instead of demanding “Look at me” through imperative commands, the handbook suggests approaches that respect individual processing differences:

Say “I’m worried you might miss something important if you don’t look” (sharing concern rather than commanding)
Make observations during moments when the child is naturally looking around
Allow discovery learning through observation rather than directing attention
Respect individual differences in how visual information is processed

This approach builds functional skills while respecting sensory processing differences.

Using Episodic Memory for Problem-Solving

Episodic memory—the ability to recall relevant past experiences and apply them to current situations—is crucial for social competence and independence. The handbook explains that many neurodivergent individuals struggle with episodic memory, which affects:

Recognizing patterns across similar situations
Developing independence and self-sufficiency
Reducing anxiety about novel experiences
Building expectations based on past experiences

Without strong episodic memory, each situation can feel brand new and overwhelming, contributing to anxiety and resistance to change.

Supporting Memory Development

The handbook provides specific strategies for supporting memory formation through slowed-down teaching moments. Instead of rushing through experiences, adults can use strategic memory support:

“I remember last time you forgot your homework, we emailed your teacher” (connecting past and present)
“Let’s remember together that when we start another game, it will be Johnny’s turn first” (building expectations)
Pause during key learning moments to highlight what’s happening
Break situations into smaller, understandable pieces that can be stored as memories
Use guiding language to support memory formation for future reference

This intentional approach to memory-building creates a library of experiences that children can draw on for independent problem-solving.

Perspective-Taking and Appreciating Different Opinions

Creating Safety Around Difference

Many neurodivergent individuals become defensive when others think differently or have different preferences, perceiving difference as threat or criticism. The handbook addresses this by creating safety around diverse perspectives:

Modeling openness to difference: “We think differently about that!” or “Wow! You are a big fan of XYZ. We’re different that way!” These statements frame difference as interesting rather than wrong.

Structured Opinion Grid activities create simple tables documenting different reactions to items, normalizing diversity through visual representation. For example, a family might document who loves pizza and who prefers tacos, creating concrete evidence that different preferences are normal and acceptable.

Planting seeds of curiosity about others: “I wonder if your buddy likes pretzels as much as you do” or “I’m curious about what your friend thinks about that.” These statements invite consideration of others’ mental states without demanding performance.

Creating Mistake Tolerance

The Problem with Errorless Learning

The handbook challenges the common approach of errorless learning in neurodivergent education. While errorless learning may achieve short-term compliance, it often creates significant long-term problems:

Reinforces that mistakes are unacceptable or dangerous
Prevents development of resilience and error recovery skills
Creates perfectionism and avoidance behaviors
Limits genuine learning and skill development

When children never experience mistakes, they don’t develop the crucial skill of recognizing and recovering from errors—an essential life skill.

Building Safe Learning Environments

The handbook advocates for allowing natural discovery and modeling healthy relationships with mistakes:

Allowing natural discovery: Give children time to discover mistakes themselves rather than immediately correcting. Wait quietly for self-recognition. Guide observation through declarative statements: “I think that word has an ‘e’ in it” rather than “That’s wrong.”

Modeling mistakes openly: “Oops! I took a wrong turn. I need to turn the car around” or “My bad! I put the milk in the pantry instead of the fridge.” These moments show responsibility-taking without shame, modeling that mistakes are normal and fixable.

Supportive error recovery: “Let’s see how we can fix this. I bet we can do it together.” The handbook recommends children’s books like Beautiful Oops and the Amelia Bedelia series that address mistakes humorously and normalize error recovery.

Building Cognitive Flexibility: Thinking in Alternatives

Understanding Underlying Rigidity

Many neurodivergent individuals think concretely or rigidly, becoming stressed when single preferred ways aren’t possible. The handbook emphasizes addressing thinking flexibility rather than just behavioral flexibility. Behavioral compliance without cognitive understanding is fragile and doesn’t generalize to new situations.

Strategies for Building Flexibility

Low-stakes possibility planting introduces alternatives during calm moments when the child is regulated: “Maybe we could walk a different way than we usually do today” or “I’m wondering what topping we could add to our pancakes.” These small invitations to consider alternatives build flexibility muscles without pressure.

Safe brainstorming creates environments where all ideas are welcome: “Every idea is good enough to write down” and “You don’t have to use what you’ve written unless you want to.” Communicate openness: “Wow! What an interesting idea!” rather than evaluating or judging suggestions.

Transparent decision-making models flexible thinking: “I’m trying to decide whether we should walk or bike” or “I’m not sure if I’ll like it, but I’m going to try.” These statements show that uncertainly and consideration of alternatives are normal parts of thinking.

Pacing: the Essential Partner to Declarative Language

The Critical Importance of Wait Time

Pacing—slowing down information delivery—is presented as equally crucial as the language itself. The mechanism involves three steps:

Deliver one unit of information
Wait for child to show receipt through visual reference, action, or discovery
Maintain silence during processing

Many adults rush to fill silence or repeat instructions, but this prevents neurodivergent individuals from completing necessary processing. The handbook emphasizes that non-response is always diagnostic—it’s never “won’t,” it’s always “can’t” for specific reasons, most commonly insufficient processing time.

Practical Pacing Guidelines

The handbook recommends specific practices:

Count silently to 30 initially after making a declarative statement
Observe child’s feedback to determine next steps
Don’t fill silence with more words or questions
Allow complex cognitive work to occur during waiting periods
Recognize that processing time varies widely among individuals

What Happens During Processing Time

During waiting periods, children engage in substantial cognitive work:

Integrating environmental information with language input
Processing language and contextual clues
Recognizing feelings and accessing relevant memories
Engaging in problem-solving before taking action
Coordinating executive function for response

Rushing this process prevents completion of necessary cognitive steps and can lead to overwhelm or burnout.

Troubleshooting When Declarative Language Doesn’t Work

Understanding Non-Response

The handbook provides systematic troubleshooting for situations where declarative language seems ineffective. The foundational principle: non-response is always diagnostic communication, not defiance or intentional resistance.

Processing time issues: Most common problem is not waiting long enough. Solution: Count to 30 silently after each statement, extending wait time as needed.

Attention problems: Child heard words but didn’t process meaning. Solution: Secure attention first, minimize distractions, use communication repair strategies like “I’m not sure if you heard me—I said that…”

Comprehension gaps: Child doesn’t understand what to do. Solution: Break down into smaller chunks, add guiding information, use visual supports.

Established habits: Child accustomed to different communication style. Solution: Consistency and patience during adjustment period, which may take weeks or months depending on age and history.

Appropriate Use of Imperative Language

When Imperatives Are Necessary

Importantly, this is not an all-or-nothing framework. The handbook acknowledges appropriate uses for imperative language:

Safety situations: Real danger requiring immediacy justifies direct commands like “Get down,” “Hold my hand,” or “Don’t run.” Sometimes combine with information: “Hold my hand—the street is busy” to provide context.

Setting limits: Can use declaratives for firm limits (“It is important that you hold my hand in the parking lot”) but sometimes more direct language is needed in specific moments for clarity and safety.

During learning phase: Be gracious with yourself while developing new skills. Rephrase when you catch yourself using imperatives, recognizing that changing communication patterns takes time and practice.

Recognizing Progress and Change

Factors Affecting Pace of Change

The handbook sets realistic expectations about the pace of change:

Child’s age and developmental level
Duration of prior communication patterns
Consistency of declarative language use across environments
Individual neurological profile and processing differences

Change is often gradual rather than dramatic, with progress accumulating over months of consistent implementation.

Observable Progress Indicators

The handbook provides specific markers of progress to watch for:

Increased spontaneous visual referencing
More independent problem-solving without adult intervention
More spontaneous expression and initiation of communication
Increased flexibility and adaptability in routine changes
Faster error recovery and reduced distress about mistakes
Genuine curiosity about others’ thoughts and feelings
More sophisticated language use with cognitive verbs
Reduced power struggles and resistance
Increased sense of competence and confidence
Better self-advocacy and ability to express needs

Key Insights and Practical Strategies

Strategy 1: Systematic Replacement Practice

Choose one daily routine (bedtime, morning, etc.) and pre-write declarative alternatives for typical imperatives. Practice for one week before expanding to other routines. This focused practice builds skill and habit without requiring immediate transformation of all communication.

Strategy 2: Wait Time Mastery

Use a 30-second timer for pacing practice to develop internal sense of appropriate wait time. Observe child’s processing indicators to individualize timing. Gradually extend waiting periods as you become more comfortable with silence.

Strategy 3: Memory Building Through Slowed-Down Teaching

Identify key learning moments in daily life and deliberately slow down during these moments. Break experiences into smaller pieces with guiding language. Support memory formation for future independence by highlighting what’s worth remembering.

Strategy 4: Flexibility Planting

Introduce alternatives during low-stakes moments when the child is calm and regulated. Model uncertainty and possibility thinking explicitly. Normalize different preferences and opinions through structured activities and casual conversation.

Strategy 5: Mistake Modeling and Discovery

Model your own mistakes openly and without shame. Allow children to discover errors themselves rather than immediately correcting. Support self-correction through observation and declarative guidance rather than directives.

Strategy 6: Perspective-Taking Through Structured Observation

Create Opinion Grids with family members to document different reactions to various items. Discuss and normalize differences explicitly. Use these structured activities to build curiosity about others’ mental states.

Integration with Neurodiversity-Affirming Approaches

Supporting Identity and Self-Understanding

This approach aligns with neurodiversity principles by respecting individual differences in communication and processing. Rather than focusing on compliance or masking, it builds genuine competence and supports authentic self-expression. The approach:

Respects individual communication and processing differences
Focuses on environmental adaptations rather than individual compliance
Builds genuine competence rather than masking neurodivergent traits
Supports authentic self-expression and self-advocacy

Creating Inclusive Environments

For professionals working with neurodivergent individuals:

Use declarative language in therapeutic and educational settings
Teach parents and educators about pacing and processing time needs
Advocate for communication-accessible environments that respect processing differences
Recognize behavior as communication about underlying needs and skills

Applications Across Settings

Home Environment Strategies

Implement declarative language during daily routines where patterns are predictable and practice is frequent. Create mistake-safe environments for learning by modeling healthy error recovery. Support episodic memory building through intentional teaching moments. Model flexible thinking and uncertainty tolerance in daily problem-solving.

Educational Settings Considerations

Adapt pacing for classroom constraints while preserving declarative principles. Use declarative language for individual student support rather than whole-class instruction. Create structured opportunities for visual referencing that don’t demand eye contact. Support peer interaction through communication guidance that respects processing differences. Consider accommodations for individual processing needs.

Therapeutic Context Integration

Incorporate into speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, and mental health support. Use as foundation for other intervention approaches. Support skill generalization across environments through consistent implementation. Address underlying communication and social cognition challenges rather than surface-level behaviors. Implement trauma-informed care principles by prioritizing safety and avoiding demands that trigger threat responses.

Resources and Further Support

Professional Support Considerations

Speech-language pathologists for communication assessment and support
Occupational therapists for sensory processing and executive function
Mental health professionals for anxiety, perfectionism, and self-esteem
Educational consultants for academic accommodations and IEP development

Conclusion: Transformation Through Thoughtful Communication

The Declarative Language Handbook offers a profound shift in how we communicate with and support neurodivergent individuals. By prioritizing safety, competence, and independence over compliance, we create environments where genuine learning and growth can flourish.

The transformation happens through accumulated small moments—thousands of declarative statements, patient waiting periods, and respectful invitations to think. While the approach requires significant adult mindset shifts and sustained commitment, the outcomes—increased independence, enhanced social competence, and improved self-advocacy—make this investment deeply worthwhile.

Divergent Tabletop Wiki

Explorer